MMM
Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Testing Report: Asus Striker II Extreme

  1. #1
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340

    Testing Report: Asus Striker II Extreme

    In this thread I will be providing you with feedback from my tests on this board.
    I just unpacked it some hours ago, and finally set up the system...with my SuperPi bench PCI Card since all my Twintech GeForce cards that I have here with me are incompatible with this board ( grrrrrr ).

    Very similar to my first experiences with the first Striker Extreme ( 680i )... tried various BIOSes... and all of them seem to have their problems.

    I'm using 0511 at the moment... the board ignores me most of the time.
    Changes the CPU Multiplier at will... boots & runs fine with the given FSB & RAM Frequency & Timings... Whenever I reboot my windows it will hang during POST before detecting the SATA drives... with the LCD Poster at "TEST MEM" [ not DRAM_DET ]

    Another reboot and the board sets its own stuff in BIOS ( without notifying me or giving me a overclocking failed message ) and POSTs & boots fine...

    I'm going to get inside the BIOS again now, set the system at stock settings ( 333MHz FSB, DDR3-1333 RAM and relaxed timings ) and see if the board is corrupting my OS or not.
    If my files are ok, I will move to 400MHz FSB & DDR3-1600 RAM and check for the SATA data corruption issue again.

    p.s. I also had some weird POST failures with the LCD Poster stopping at "INIT8042"... even at stock settings or with the "Load Default Settings" option.
    I think it happens after saving and exiting the BIOS sometimes.

    ...glory times...

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    575
    Good luck! looking forward to your results.


    Quote Originally Posted by creidiki View Post
    We are a band of fearless modern-day alchemists who, for fun, run solutions through sophisticated, if overpriced, separator setups, and then complain when we succeed in separating said solution.

  3. #3
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Couldn't resist posting this:

    This board is already pissing me off!
    It keeps disobeying me!

    One more try...and I'm reverting to a older BIOS...

  4. #4
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Just got my first SATA Data Corruption.
    Yay!

    Windows installation #2 here I come...

  5. #5
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Max FSB with my E8400 is around 580MHz

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    575
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Just got my first SATA Data Corruption.
    Yay!

    Windows installation #2 here I come...
    Have your RAM set unlinked at 1800 and see if that prevents OS corruption. It seems to help on my tests...


    Quote Originally Posted by creidiki View Post
    We are a band of fearless modern-day alchemists who, for fun, run solutions through sophisticated, if overpriced, separator setups, and then complain when we succeed in separating said solution.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    131
    i've reinstalled OS twice so far

  8. #8
    Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    1,049
    okay, today i joined the data corruption club with the S2E too when testing ddr3 over 2000mhz mem clock i think 790i is a wonderful chipset, but this problems make it unuseable, so i take the mobo in the corner till this problems will assolve i dont wanna lose my data's or hdd's

    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Max FSB with my E8400 is around 580MHz
    same here
    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
    I think mine is better.

  9. #9
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    A note for everybody ( it applies to the 790i as well... it's nothing new, just a trend from 680i )

    The FSB holes seem to depend on the Memory Clocking mode ( linked/unlinked ) and your selections.

    For example ( hypothetical numbers, didn't take any notes or did many tests ) [ but this theory comes from my experience with the 680i ] 400MHz FSB with the RAM at 1777 won't work, while it works with the ram at 1600 and 1866

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    232
    Why not just use the thread there already is? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=180445
    Not much results till now in this thread.
    This board has a huge learning curve, just like the 680i
    Am playing around with it for 3 weeks now and everyday i get one small step further, and i love it!!
    This board is so much better than the Striker Extreme 680i and Striker II Formula 780i i had before.
    Give it some time and you can achieve very good overclocks.
    QX9650 @ 4450 mhz
    Asus Striker II Extreme 790i
    4 GB Corsair Dominator 1800 @ 1870 8-8-8-20 1T 1.8v
    3 x Asus GTX280 TRI-SLI 810/1647/1296
    Asus Xonar DX
    Thermaltake Toughpower 1500 W
    Dell 30" 3007WFP
    Logitech G7, G15, G25
    Watercooling Hailea 1500 chiller, EK, Swiftech, D-Tek
    Dual Prometeia site

  11. #11
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Justifire View Post
    Why not just use the thread there already is?
    Because I plan to get things a bit more organized

    Quote Originally Posted by Justifire
    This board has a huge learning curve, just like the 680i
    Huge learning curve, huge buglist, and pretty much like the Striker Extreme.

    I've already experienced the "girlie" attitude of this board already.
    Yesterday it wouldn't treat me nice at some specific settings...and today it behaves fine at the same settings it refused to work yesterday ( exact same settings... not even a single change )

  12. #12
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Flaw #1:

    BIOS: v0511
    Issue: Cannot run DDR3-1333 5-5-4-15 at all.
    Resolution: Still working on it
    ETA: The day sun will meltdown

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    2,187
    Sounds like fun times. Buy the girl some jewelry and maybe she'll start working better(for a while at least).

  14. #14
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Flaw #1:

    BIOS: v0511
    Issue: Cannot run DDR3-1333 5-5-4-15 at all.
    Resolution: Still working on it
    ETA: The day sun will meltdown
    As suspected... it's a BIOS bug...
    Once you set tCL ( CAS Latency ) to 5 the system fails to POST.

    Video capture ( click to view / right click to download )

  15. #15
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Note to self

    Linked - Synch - 1900 doesn't work.
    However... Unlinked - 1600FSB - 1920MEM works fine [ 7-6-5-18 2T ] [ 1.40/1.60/1.40/2.16/1.66/1.60 ]

  16. #16
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Hope you get this tease working Bill and some nice benches afterwards... I'm skipping 780i and 790i for 24/7 rigs after my 680i quest...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  17. #17
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Thank m8.
    Yeah, I'm hoping for some good SLI benching sessions with this board.

    I'm currently memtesting the **** out of it

    BIOSes 0511/0512 are ignoring the tRFC setting.
    Don't remember if the previously used ones ( 0507,0508,0509 ) did that too.
    Will have to check.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    972
    Hey BenchZowner

    What would be the best or more stable 4.0 + Quad BIOS out right now? 0511 or 0601? Also what is the safe MAX CPU VTT settings? I see on another review site saying not to go over a 1.36V or say goodbye to your CPU if you do? LINK

    Thanks...
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 4.8GHz
    MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-G1.Sniper M5 MATX 1150
    MEMORY: G.SKILL Trident X 8GB 2400MHz 9-11-11-31 1T
    GPU: 2 x eVGA GTX 780 SC
    SOUND KRK Rokit 5 Limited Edition White Studio Monitors
    SSD: 4 x Samsung 128GB Pro's Raid 0
    PSU: SeaSonic Platinum 1000W
    COOLING: 2 x Alphacool NexXxoS UT60 Full Copper 420mm 6 x Swiftech Helix 140mm Fans
    CASE: Lian Li PC-C32B TECH STATION MOD build log coming soon
    MONITOR: ASUS VG278HE Black 27" 149Hz
    O.S: Windows 7 Pro x64

  19. #19
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    I've been using 0601 lately, and it looks ok ( apart from the irritating bug ignoring my tRFC setting in BIOS [ but thanks to memset I do set it to what I want it to be when I get in windows ] ).
    Max SAFE VTT for a 45nm Quad I'd say 1.42V
    Usually at 1.35V you get your "max" FSB for the QX's, so you shouldn't worry about not going higher.

  20. #20
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Any updates there Bench ? Wrestling with my old buddy the Striker Extreme, heheh board was flawless for 3 days with the E8400 at 4ghz and 1504 bios, yesterday she didn't even get me into winblows, till now 1501 does the trick... awaiting next error code....

    Really wondering if it's Asus or Nvidia craptacular design lol
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  21. #21
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    I left the asus to rest a bit as I was busy testing and writing the 3D Mark Vantage review.
    Tomorrow I'll start testing the S2E again and simultaneously write the review of the gigabyte board.

    The S2E review will probably be ready in 2 weeks

  22. #22
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •