Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Leaked Intel Nehalem Performance Projections Over AMD Shanghai

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    498

    Leaked Intel Nehalem Performance Projections Over AMD Shanghai

    Haven't seen this one up yet:





    The leaked slide from Sun’s presentation: (taken offline by now).



    The leaked slide deck also includes more information about Intel's Penryn successor, codenamed Nehalem. Nehalem is everything Penryn is -- 45nm, SSE4, quad-core -- and then some. For starters, Intel will abandon the front-side bus model in favor of QuickPath Interconnect; a serial bus similar to HyperTransport.

    As noted by ZDNet blogger George Ou, the slides contain some rudimentry benchmarks for Nehalem and other publicly available processors. From this slide deck, Ou estimates Nehalem's SPEC*fp_rate_base2006 at 163 and the SPEC*int_rate_base2006 at 176. By contrast, Intel's fastest Harpertown Xeon X5482 pulls a measly 80 and 122 SPEC fp and int rate_base2006.

    According to Ou's extrapolated data, Intel expects a 2.8GHz Shanghai processor from AMD to have an int_rate score of 121 and an fp_rate score of 123, both higher than the respective 80 and 122 scores of its 3.2GHz quad-core Xeon X5482. However, Ou says Intel also expects a Nehalem chip with undisclosed specifications to score 176 in int_rate and 163 in fp_rate, wiping the floor with the Shanghai part. Intel's slide doesn't say how fast it actually runs, though.

    The Nehalem processor more than doubles the floating point performance of its current Penryn-family processors. Ou adds, "We’ll most likely know by the end of this year what the actual scores are, but I doubt they will be more than 5% to 10% off from these estimated projections."
    ZDNet Via DailyTech

    http://www.computerbase.de/news/hard...em_performance

    http://techreport.com/discussions.x/14216

    Projected scores but interesting nonetheless. If true, Nehalem looks like a beast. Shanghai looks like it has a very decent improvment as well, but not enough to reach Nehalem. Pretty much as excpected I think.
    Faceman


  2. #2
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    I saw it yesterday morning at DailyTech. I found it very interesting as the early tests go.
    Last edited by Metroid; 02-25-2008 at 12:41 PM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    People should just remember rates benchmarks are very deceptive. Nehalem basicly just wins this so much due to trichannel and CSI.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    396
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    People should just remember rates benchmarks are very deceptive. Nehalem basicly just wins this so much due to trichannel and CSI.
    hmmm... benchmarks that highlight a specific attribute...

    makes me wonder if this "leak" has any shades of INTC Blue in its origin
    New work-in-progress - watercooled dual-rad Lian-Li A05:
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=156162
    Opteron 175 @ 3.0GHz
    273x11

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    298
    These posts are from February 2008

    edit.. ooops epic thread revival :p

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    what would really be interesting is to see what speed the nehalem is based on and what the spec performance is without the HT.

  7. #7
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Soon enough...but this thread is obsolete

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •