Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38

Thread: first preview of 8800GT 256MB (VS 3850/86GTS/88GT 512)

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    65

    first preview of 8800GT 256MB (VS 3850/86GTS/88GT 512)

    source: Expreview(English version coming soon)


    GPU-Z

    Testbed:

    Windows Vista Ultimate 32bit SP1 RC Preview v.658 with Aero
    Core 2 Quad Q6700 OC 333MHzX9
    Asustek P5E3 Deluxe/Wifi-AP with DDR3-1066 6-6-6-18-1T
    NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 256MB/512MB: 169.02 WHQL
    NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB: 163.75 WHQL
    ATi Radeon 3850 256MB: 7.11 hotfix

    Round1: 8800GT 256MB VS 8600GTS 256MB:


    Round2: 8800GT 256MB VS HD3850 256MB:


    Round3: 8800GT 256MB VS 8800GT 512MB:

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    125
    Looks good for peoople who want to play at 1280x1024 or lower

  3. #3
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Even though I'm currently using 1280x960, I would rather choose the 512MB since in Crysis and other demanding new titles and upcoming ones wants more than 256MB even in this res when applying filters. 512MB is really the lowest I'd go today, heck that's what I've used for a year already and this card was cheap (but slow today).

    256MB sounds too low for other than people on a budget.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 11-18-2007 at 11:49 PM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario Canada
    Posts
    1,433
    price difference?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    466
    If priced right it should own that section of the market. Looks like Nvidia are going all out.

  6. #6
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Sub-$200 to compete with the HD3850. Great for 1280x1024, glad to see it scales rather nicely though. Crushes the 3850 that's for sure.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,838
    saying its good at a particular resolution is a little misleading. saying its good for older games is more accurate.
    DFI P965-S/core 2 quad q6600@3.2ghz/4gb gskill ddr2 @ 800mhz cas 4/xfx gtx 260/ silverstone op650/thermaltake xaser 3 case/razer lachesis

  8. #8
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Interesting tid bit:
    The HD 3950 loses 26.11 FPS using 4xAA/16xAF in EP2 from 1280 to 1920
    The 8800GT 256 loses 29.92 FPS using 4xAA/16xAF in EP2 from 1280 to 1680 then errors out at 1920.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post
    Interesting tid bit:
    The HD 3950 loses 26.11 FPS using 4xAA/16xAF in EP2 from 1280 to 1920
    The 8800GT 256 loses 29.92 FPS using 4xAA/16xAF in EP2 from 1280 to 1680 then errors out at 1920.
    Probably thanks to ATI 's memory ring bus technology capable of handling high resolution and AA with limited memory i guess.
    Core i7 8700k @ 5.1Ghz * Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 5 * 4x8GB Corsair RGB @ 3600 16-18-18-36 * GTX 1080ti @ 2050/11400 * Plextor M8Pe 512GB * Creative Sound Blaster Z * Audioengine 5+ * Corsair Obsidian 750D * Corsair RM1000 watt

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    how much it will cost 250 haha cause 512 version is higher than $ 300

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    275
    so a 1GB card is not worth buying for me as I play at 1280*960 full AA AF, even 256MB could be enough, though I'd pick a 512MB for sure. interesting
    ASUS P8P67
    i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.6GHz
    Twintech 8800 GT 512Mo Samsung (vgpu modded)
    Crucial Ballistix DDR3 C7 2 * 2Go
    2 * WD VelociRaptor 150Go RAID 0
    2 * Samsung Spinpoint F3 1To RAID 0
    Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
    Seasonic S12 600HT


    WC :

    1A-SL2 CPU // 1A-SL2 GPU (home made fix)
    Eheim 1048 + magicool 25
    2 * Black Ice Pro 3 serial
    Tygon 3603 + glycoshell

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    466
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post
    Interesting tid bit:
    The HD 3950 loses 26.11 FPS using 4xAA/16xAF in EP2 from 1280 to 1920
    The 8800GT 256 loses 29.92 FPS using 4xAA/16xAF in EP2 from 1280 to 1680 then errors out at 1920.
    Yeah but on average it's 30fps faster so that extra 3fps isn't much overall. The error is strange, maybe a driver issue. Anyway as stated the res for this card should be 1280 max and the lack of ram would make any recent game crash at 1920.

    Competition is a wonderful thing. To think of the crap of the 8600, etc. Should be a great card for the average gamer.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    I'm calling BS on this one. I have seen time and again the HD3870 beat the living crap out of the 8800GT 512MB in Half Life 2: EP2 and now these guys are saying the 256MB 8800GT beats the HD3780? Puhlease.

    Rule of thumb = don't pay attention to pre-review benches.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    466
    No not the 3870 it's actually against the 3850. You're right tho nothing is real until it's released...but their track record is pretty good for this kind of stuff.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    102
    Quite interesting,those with those 19" (1.3Mp<) may just manage with 256MB without AA.
    The question is will crysis and UT3 will fit in without too much sacrifice?

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    386
    well i bought a 3850 this weekend shoud arrive tomorrow seeing as it will only be a htpc card im going to be very happy but i will be interested to see what results this brings around (and whether its availible or not)
    Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7
    Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7
    Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7
    server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1000 Elysian Park Ave
    Posts
    2,669
    But i don't see that big of a performance difference @ 1680, why do you guys say i need 512mb?....
    i3-8100 | GTX 970
    Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
    Assume nothing; Question everything

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by HKPolice View Post
    price difference?
    In the UK it is approx as follows.

    HD 3850 256MB - £112
    8800 GT 256MB - £118

    HD 3870 512MB - £150 (started out at £130)
    8800 GT 512MB - £176 (started out at £140)


    www.scan.co.uk - all ZERO STOCK, last 8800GT sold a few days ago.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Kingcarcas View Post
    But i don't see that big of a performance difference @ 1680, why do you guys say i need 512mb?....
    You dont. But if I were you i would get a 512MB card. Simply due to bigegr textures and such with time and DX10.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    Even though I'm currently using 1280x960, I would rather choose the 512MB since in Crysis and other demanding new titles and upcoming ones wants more than 256MB even in this res when applying filters. 512MB is really the lowest I'd go today, heck that's what I've used for a year already and this card was cheap (but slow today).

    256MB sounds too low for other than people on a budget.

    yep , i also think 512MB its minimum today

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingcarcas View Post
    But i don't see that big of a performance difference @ 1680, why do you guys say i need 512mb?....
    HL2 not too heavy and its more CPU dependent than VGA.

    i think it&#180;s better wait for more tests in games like Crysis , COD4 ......................


    btw: 8800GT 256mb used in this pre-view has 1800Mhz memory , the Nvidia reference cards are 1400Mhz


    regards
    Last edited by mascaras; 11-19-2007 at 07:44 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    532
    8800 GT 256 > hd 3850 > 8800 GT 512MB - is this right?
    neither is really available in europe.. and price difference is next to zero.
    So AMD/ATI lost once again in price and price/performance? I guess the only positive thing *may be* 55nm yields, die size and thermals...
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    the idiots out number us 10,000:1

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    313
    Ok come on, 12,5k in 3dmark for 8800gt but only 10,5k for 3850gt ?

    Show me THAT system !

    Oh of course you could underclock the 3850 to make it possible
    System : E6600 @ 3150mhz, Gigabyte DS3, 4gb Infineon 667mhz, Amd-Ati X1900XT

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    1,838
    I thought this would happen, nVidia have done it again, the 8800GT 256 crushes the 3850 in performance.

    It seems that nVidia have won every single segment of the market. They have the highend crown, the midrange crown and the low end crown aswell as best bang for buck.

    Ouch for ATI they have been given a beating.

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    I'm calling BS on this one. I have seen time and again the HD3870 beat the living crap out of the 8800GT 512MB in Half Life 2: EP2 and now these guys are saying the 256MB 8800GT beats the HD3780? Puhlease.

    Rule of thumb = don't pay attention to pre-review benches.
    I'd say you're being a little optimistic. Most of the HD3870 reviews I've seen put the HD3870 quite a ways back of the 8800GT in HL2:EP2, except for your review, where the HD3870 absolutely dominates at 1600x1200 w/ 8XAA. Take a look at the discrepancy.

    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...html#post26213

    http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3151&p=6
    http://firingsquad.com/hardware/amd_...view/page9.asp
    http://www.hothardware.com/articles/..._RV670/?page=5

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    559
    lol, try playing eq2 @ 1280x1024 with 256mb of vram, that 8800gt 256mb will cry.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •