P5W DH Bios 1402 Downward Multies!!!!!

[veryevil]

Check out http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/showthread.php?t=256507

New bios 1402 now with downward multies

Running my E6600 @ 375x8! and going for more!

[lawrywild]

Flashing now..

*results in a mo*

[mascaras]

i dont know about 975 chipset mobos , but ALL 965 chipset mobos downward the CPU multis since the begining, LOLOL


regards

[Wrangler88]

it does work!! but in the bios, it shows i can change it from 20-6, if my default is 9, i wonder what 10 does.. ill be back!

[^don.k's^]

i dont know about 975 chipset mobos , but ALL 965 chipset mobos downward the CPU multis since the begining, LOLOL


regards

It doesnt has to be with the chipset, but with the BIOS, at least Asus wanted to publish a BIOS that has real improvement... Now lets go for the Ai booster support... LOL

Regards!

[eva2000]

wow much needed i think

[lkraven]

I would love to get my E6600 to 400x8 to get 3.2 and run my memory at its rated 800mhz and a 1:1 divider. I know what I'll be doing this evening.

[mascaras]

it does work!! but in the bios, it shows i can change it from 20-6, if my default is 9, i wonder what 10 does.. ill be back!

NO , you didnt understand , what they say is that you can lower the multi not rise the multi , if your default multi is x9 you cant use x10 , x11 or other else higher than default .

i thought all mobos can do that , i can lower multi with DS3 , DS4 and S3 since the begining.


the asus P5WDH didnt allow to downward the multi before this BIOS ???

regards

[Brahmzy]

So the P5W nears the P5B D in the HOT board crown again. I need to go home sick and try it out, hehe.

So, currently I'm @ 400x9 1:1.

Is it even possible for my OCZ Plat 6400 REV. 2 to do 450x8 1:1?

Am I high?

[Icer]

So the P5W nears the P5B D in the HOT board crown again. I need to go home sick and try it out, hehe.

*Cough* *Cough* Yep, I may need to go home also!

[Wrangler88]

ok beforei could only do with my 6600 was 378 x9, now i can do 420x8 but if i try 425x8 i get bios issues with my video card or somethigns the post screen is all screwed up, it did do manual times of 4,4,4,12,4 for my gskill hz's and it seems to take it ok.. anyone else with booting issues using the 8 multi and a 6600? oh yeah i tried putting in a mutli and 10 and it doesnt save it, also pc probe still says 256 degrees here and there..

[eva2000]

ok beforei could only do with my 6600 was 378 x9, now i can do 420x8 but if i try 425x8 i get bios issues with my video card or somethigns the post screen is all screwed up, it did do manual times of 4,4,4,12,4 for my gskill hz's and it seems to take it ok.. anyone else with booting issues using the 8 multi and a 6600?

did you lock your PCI-E frequency at 100mhz ?

[Wrangler88]

heres a screenie

[EJTREM3]

Because they use that configuration? 420*8 having an e6600, I with my ds3 it use asi but in 367*9 at vcore 1.375

[pcdoc1]

Very damn cool..... May see some NEW SuperPi numbers...

OT: 965 users, how 'bout a “cease and desist� on the thread crapping already!

[Helix]

it does work!! but in the bios, it shows i can change it from 20-6, if my default is 9, i wonder what 10 does.. ill be back!

soo what's the result? Do you try the 10multi?

[mascaras]

Because they use that configuration? 420*8 having an e6600, I with my ds3 it use asi but in 367*9 at vcore 1.375

cause lowering multi x8 you wil get more speed RAM using 1:1 :



420x8 = 3360mhz and Ram 420mhz (DDR2-840) cl4-4-4-12

368x9 = 3312mhz but ram 368mhz (DDR2-736)Cl4-4-4-12 ( you can have more Mhz with Ram but not 1:1 , you have to use divisors )


regards

[EJTREM3]

i am using 4:5 mem divisor, at 458mhz in cas 5.

[Jimi...]

Is this still beta 'cause it's not on Asus's support site.

[Plaicd]

It works for me with e6400 cpu. Can go down to x7 with no problem up to about 425. After that windows hard locks after a short time.

Bios still needs better memory tweaking.

[mascaras]

i am using 4:5 mem divisor, at 458mhz in cas 5.

yep , but its not same ,is always better using 1:1, and also better performence .

regards

[mascaras]

It works for me with e6400 cpu. Can go down to x7 with no problem up to about 425. After that windows hard locks after a short time.

Bios still needs better memory tweaking.

so it seams max FSB is 420/425 :


Wrangler88 -- E6600 // 420 FSB

Plaicd --- E6400 // 425 FSB


regards

[Wrangler88]

ok well heres what i found out after playing around.. my original setup was with an e6600
378x9 = 3.400 @ 1.55v (bios)
now
420x8=3.360 @ 1.55v (bios)

if i try anything over 421 the bios post looks all strange, anything over 423 and i get my video card bios is corrupt, that is with the pci-express on auto or locked at 100, or locked all the way up to 110, no differnce, tried the 7x multi thinking i could go higher than 420 with that, but still the same thing, anything over 421 and the bios is all screwy, seems they might still have some bugs in this bios version. also running the fsb at 420, my rams at 840, trying to use a divider to get 1050, makes the computer not boot, i dont think its the ram i relaxed the timings and every cranked the voltage and still no post, but now i get when it posted and it didnt do this the first few times, cpu ucode error... whats that mean.. anyone else able to get over 421??

[mascaras]

ok well heres what i found out after playing around.. my original setup was with an e6600
378x9 = 3.400 @ 1.55v (bios)
now
420x8=3.360 @ 1.55v (bios)

if i try anything over 421 the bios post looks all strange, anything over 423 and i get my video card bios is corrupt, that is with the pci-express on auto or locked at 100, or locked all the way up to 110, no differnce, tried the 7x multi thinking i could go higher than 420 with that, but still the same thing, anything over 421 and the bios is all screwy, seems they might still have some bugs in this bios version. also running the fsb at 420, my rams at 840, trying to use a divider to get 1050, makes the computer not boot, i dont think its the ram i relaxed the timings and every cranked the voltage and still no post, but now i get when it posted and it didnt do this the first few times, cpu ucode error... whats that mean.. anyone else able to get over 421??

thats what i said before , it looks like the max FSB its around 420/425 FSB ( and with issues) .





Wrangler88 -- E6600 using x8 // 420 FSB

Plaicd --- E6400 using x7 // 425 FSB


try more vFSB , but i doubt you can run more than that >>> 975 chip7 timings .


regards

[Mickey Knox]

Thanks for posting this veryevil
I cant wait to get home, and try this bad boy out.