It looks to me like the Phenom II's still dont have enough intercore bandwidth, the FPU performance is lagging again, like it was in the K6 vs PII days and the ALU Performance could be improved too.
I had considered getting a Phenom II setup, but after a raft of benchmarks from numerous sources, i've come to the conclusion that a change to the Green side once again, would be a step BACKWARDS.
Come on AMD, pull the finger out
Main Rig
Intel Core i7-2600K (SLB8W, E0 Stepping) @ 4.6Ghz (4.6x100), Corsair H80i AIO Cooler
MSI Z77A GD-65 Gaming (MS-7551), v25 BIOS
Kingston HyperX 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-19200 Kit (HX24C11BRK2/16-OC) @ 1.5v, 11-13-13-30 Timings (1:8 Ratio)
8GB MSI Radeon R9 390X (1080 Mhz Core, 6000 Mhz Memory)
NZXT H440 Case with NZXT Hue+ Installed
24" Dell U2412HM (1920x1200, e-IPS panel)
1 x 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (Boot & Install)
1 x 2Tb Hitachi 7K2000 in External Enclosure (Scratch Disk)
Entertainment Setup
Samsung Series 6 37" 1080p TV
Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H based media PC, Mini ITX Case, Blu-Ray Drive
Netgear ReadyNAS104 w/4x2TB Toshiba DTACA200's for 5.8TB Volume size
I refuse to participate in any debate with creationists because doing so would give them the "oxygen of respectability" that they want.
Creationists don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters to them is that I give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public.
Say again?
"you are telling me"... "they are telling me"...
You are entitled to an opinion, and I usually enjoy your posts.
I am not telling you nothing. I am arguing with you. This is a discussion forum remember?
Edit:
Great work Vozer!
If you bring in the price factor we see a winner I think.
Remember that the ci7-route will mean 20% performance increase (mostly synthetic) for 500% the price (completyely new rig vs. new CPU).
The reason for that is that AMD's new FPU needs a re compile of your software for it to work at max.
And talking about going "backwards" how much of a difference do you notice when you're using your computer on a daily basis? I for example always have a lot running at the same time. My experience with intel cpu's is that they get in trouble when I have too much running at the same time.
Too bad I never see benchmarks that simulate a daily use of computers.
For example rip a dvd while internet radio is on, 3 different instant messengers, 6 internet explorer windows open and many more. My AMD systems handle all that a lot smoother than my intel systems does.
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ @ 2800Mhz
Zalman CNPS9500
Asus M2N-E
2GB PQI DDRII @ 800Mhz CL5
Asus GeForce 7900GT @ 550/1520
18x DVD Burner
Maxtor 120GB IDE
WD 160GB SATA
Iiyama Vision Master Pro 410
Saving for Phenom X4
*Cough* Bull. *Cough*
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
..
I believe deneb with some tweaking and maybe some ddr3 will be very close to yorkfield o/ced offcourse.
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
Are you so sure?
Hasn't AMD said they aren't supplying AM2+ Quads after Q2 09, yet you think 6 & 8 core versions will work with AM2+ boards?
Well unlike you, I don't automatically believe everything I see on an AMD Powerpoint slide.and what do you mean god only knows when they will be released? its not very hard to just google it.......
Hence my question about when it would be released.idk if amd is even making an 8 core.
ok so heres a few things. if you actually read my post i said it is using amd's new rectangular socket. no where did i say it uses am2+. also why do i need to look at all the amd power point slides? why can't i just ask them? or even better walk in there and look at them.
Roofsniper.......Him and a few others in here DON'T read or DON'T know how to read. Keep your IQ and don't argue with brick walls. A few of these fellas talk loud and say nothing. They usually end up making themselves look silly anyway as you can see.
Yes, but it didn't appear to make a lot of sense.
So what did you mean by saying "the 6 cores and 8 cores shouldn't even be am3."?i said it is using amd's new rectangular socket. no where did i say it uses am2+
Aren't all AMD CPU's released in the next 12 to 18 months at least going to either be on AM2+ or AM3 socket only? As you appeared to rule out AM3, that is why I questioned you about AM2+
You have a direct line to Dirk?also why do i need to look at all the amd power point slides? why can't i just ask them?
They will let you pass security?or even better walk in there and look at them.
I was waiting for that "argument" to show up. When your favorite company releases in 2009 a product that is competing head-to-head with a 2-year-old product from the Dark Side, it all comes down to arguments like "how much do we really need?" and "my S754 system performs as well as your S775 one"
And remember: a 2 year lag in this industry, is as big as the difference between remaining competitive and going out of business :/
Finally, I know that AMD going bankrupt is of no benefit for anyone in here, but there's no point in not saying things the way they are.
Intel will be shrinking their i7 line very soon, so if AMD are releasing their new product in 2009, a few quarters before the i7's 32nm shrink, it should be at least competitive with the 45nm i7's, not just struggling with the 65nm Core2's that were introduced in November 2006
Yes, we can start saying that "I only care about Quake 4 performance", "I'm happy with my 5200+" and "It's not a complete slaughter in the native 64-bit apps" but none of these excuses will change the fact that you cannot release a new CPU 5% faster than your previous one and 25% slower than the current competition. At this point, I am starting to wonder if AMD can ever design something better than Intel's product and the hints I have been getting in the last couple of year, are just plain disappointing...
Look at Vozer's table: Kentsfield beating Deneb in every single 3D rendering test. That shouldn't even be happening, it's not acceptable.
To put it in perspective, I'll use an analogy: how ridiculous would it look if ATI released their brand new 5870 and "in a few tests" it was scoring worse than an 8800GT. Just think about it...
i5 660 / Asrock P55M Pro / Ripjaws / GTS250
this nice but I would really like to point out that 12mb cache is a 25% more then deneb. If the Q9400 we could see a the difference cache makes it york field, since it's improved over conroe and conroe 4mb was 10% faster then then ones with 2mbs of cache.
if intel can make a Q8200 to compete with Agena, with the same amount of cache I'm sure they can make an 8mb cache york field too.
Has anyone else noticed that cpu performance has started to matter in gaming again? Of course only single gpu tests matter and overclocking really matters again, There is a thread in the news section where rammsteiner actually said this
"Time will tell though. Numbers hardly matter anyway, Agena was more a disaster because it couldnt OC very good. OC'ers killing people for a better benchmark number dont like that, go to Intel, average customers read and hear how and what and go with Intel. Now with the improved clocking I think they already gain a whole lot. Having a 4Ghz i7 or Deneb for gaming... Now dont tell me this difference is so significant you'd get an i7 over Deneb"
Yes folks overclocking matters again but what is funny is that old rammy has ALWAYS said "I prefer phenom because it is fun to overclock " now he says "Agena was more a disaster because it couldnt OC very good" WTF?
Unfortunately ipc still does not matter for some reason.
Remember people, All that matters is gpu limited gaming benches.
cache dentistry form the transistor level.
meaning it takes less transistor for intel, then it will for AMD. AMd is working on improving that already.
I just want know how much of difference in cache it makes on york field and/or wolfdale.
rammy is talking about two different things in those one is about phenom launch and getting poor reviews because it failed to get to 3.0ghz also seem to because of TLB in OC.
he prefers to mes with phenom what's so hard to get about that ? there are ton of things to tweak.
Bookmarks