Results 1 to 25 of 1570

Thread: 2x1GB/1x1GB OC Database

Hybrid View

  1. 07-20-2005, 08:50 PM #1
    rise4310
    rise4310 is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by Major
    here are some preliminary results with the Ballistix:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=69390

    280mhz so far, stable in memtest to 290mhz !

    I'm a very happy camper so far !
    yowsa, sweet sticks!! i'd have the shakes with those too
    a64 x2 3800+ 10x270, xp-90
    nf4-sli-dr 6.23 official
    2x1024 mushkin hp blue pc-3200 (2.5-3-2-8 @ 245mhz)
    evga 7800gtx, 450/1200 (stock)
    74gb raptor, 250gb wd caviar se
    nec-3500a, artec 16x dvd-rom
    diamond pvr550
    cm praetorian
    antec tpII 550

    Heat
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-20-2005, 09:47 PM #2
    nugzo
    nugzo is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville, North Carolina.
    Posts
    1,476
    Send a message via MSN to nugzo

    285

    Ok OK ive been screamin about low voltage workin better on this ballistix. i just proved myself wrong. I'm 285 stable @ 2.8v 3-3-3-8 1T 704-3 bios, orange slots.




    285*9 3-3-3-8


    285*9.5 3-3-3-10




    CPU-Z
    Last edited by nugzo; 07-21-2005 at 07:51 AM.
    Gigabyte Z68X UD7
    Intel Core i7 2600K (testing)
    16GB Mushkin Redline 17000 2133 1.65v
    EK, 3x120 Rad 2xMCP655
    Acer 1200w PSU
    2-128GB Samsung SSD RAID 0
    2-1TB Seagete 32mb RAID 0
    1-1TB Western Digital
    1- Plextor PX-B320SA Blue Ray
    1- Plextor PX-880SA 24x DVD/RW
    2- EVGA Nvidia GTX-480 SLI
    LG 30", Hanns G 28"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-21-2005, 06:23 AM #3
    betoordie
    betoordie is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Campo Grande - MS - Brazil
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by nugzo
    Ok OK ive been screamin about low voltage workin better on this ballistix. i just proved myself wrong. I'm 285 stable @ 2.8v 3-3-3-8 1T
    How much gain at Sandra's bandwith test?
    C2D 6420@3200MHz (SI-120)
    Asus P5N-E SLI (HR-05)
    2 x 1GB generic Kingston (Elpida) 667@800 (4-3-3-10-2T)
    X1900XT@XTX
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-21-2005, 06:35 AM #4
    pentium777
    pentium777 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    429

    My Ballistix

    I will be posting this weekend my successes with this RAM I've had it for over 2 weeks 210FSB @ 2-2-2-5 w/PAT enabled on a P4C800-E Deluxe now that all my gear is here I can push these babies in the X2 4400+

    It will be very difficult to finish out my workday today.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-21-2005, 06:43 AM #5
    nugzo
    nugzo is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville, North Carolina.
    Posts
    1,476
    Send a message via MSN to nugzo
    Quote Originally Posted by betoordie
    How much gain at Sandra's bandwith test?

    No gain in bandwidth with the 9.0 or 9.5 multiplier. Cpu speed is down compared to my 10 and 11 multiplier results.
    Last edited by nugzo; 07-21-2005 at 07:54 AM.
    Gigabyte Z68X UD7
    Intel Core i7 2600K (testing)
    16GB Mushkin Redline 17000 2133 1.65v
    EK, 3x120 Rad 2xMCP655
    Acer 1200w PSU
    2-128GB Samsung SSD RAID 0
    2-1TB Seagete 32mb RAID 0
    1-1TB Western Digital
    1- Plextor PX-B320SA Blue Ray
    1- Plextor PX-880SA 24x DVD/RW
    2- EVGA Nvidia GTX-480 SLI
    LG 30", Hanns G 28"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 07-21-2005, 07:17 AM #6
    EnJoY
    EnJoY is offline
    Tyler Durden
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    5,623
    Send a message via MSN to EnJoY
    Quote Originally Posted by nugzo
    No gain with 9.5 multiplier

    Doesn't .5x multi run a divider?
    Formerly XIP, now just P.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-21-2005, 07:22 AM #7
    EnJoY
    EnJoY is offline
    Tyler Durden
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    5,623
    Send a message via MSN to EnJoY
    DB Updated.
    Formerly XIP, now just P.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 07-21-2005, 07:35 AM #8
    Vapor
    Vapor is offline
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by EnJoY
    Doesn't .5x multi run a divider?
    The half multis will run the memory speed lower than you think because it rounds up the divider for memory speed. It'll do mem speed = clockspeed / X+.5 where X is your multi.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 07-21-2005, 07:44 AM #9
    EnJoY
    EnJoY is offline
    Tyler Durden
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    5,623
    Send a message via MSN to EnJoY
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor
    The half multis will run the memory speed lower than you think because it rounds up the divider for memory speed. It'll do mem speed = clockspeed / X+.5 where X is your multi.

    Do you hear that nugzo? Were you running 9.5x or 9.0x multi for your new results?
    Formerly XIP, now just P.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules