Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
I dunno in reviews I read it won in many things at 1080 1440 lost @ 4k.

Hands on with it just fooling around in some games and it's not a best case scenario with a 9900K the 6800xt is pretty damn fast. I've commonly seen this particular card running at 2.4+ auto
Seems ok with out Raytracing.
it's a bit of conidium their in comparing to 2080 Ti which has less Overall Rasterization compared to RX 6800 XT But and First gen Raytracing like RX 6800 XT
Then trying to compare to RTX 30 series you got about the same Rasterization but second Gen Raytracing.
Looks like They just need more Ray accelerators on it over all ( techpower list 6800 Xt as having 60 ray accelerators when I'm pretty sure it has 72 ray accelerators) The Ray Accelerators seem to be part of the CU's

Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
Pixel fill rate is going to be raw math. The amd cards have always been drastically more powerful in raw power. They have been 1.5-2x more since they were both unified shaders.
is that based of simple math only?
Or some kind unique code?

Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
That is a nice looking build
I concur. I like that case, but just isn't big enough for me lol

Just wish I could find a case with a fan hole or fan mount for a fan behind the motherboard.