Gtx 780ti to be faster than Titan, will battle R9 290x

[boxleitnerb]

at 4K Ultra HD or multi monitor the gap is significant. that 512 bit memory bus and 64 ROPs really make a difference at ultra high resolutions. clock speeds alone cannot make up for architectural differences.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/...card_review/14
http://www.nordichardware.se/Grafikk...0.html#content
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ew,3650-9.html
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7457/t...290x-review/11

No it is not. You're still forgetting that the GeForce cards don't run with maximum clocks, but the Radeons do, often in quiet mode as well (as evidenced by the negligible difference between quiet and uber mode in many cases, showing insufficient pre-heating procedures). This is due to the 80C temp target, especially now when many sites have changed their testing procedure to warm up the cards. I have provided you with two reviews that do proper comparisons with Titans "uber mode" if you will. The difference in 4K on average is minimal.

It's funny how incompetent many reviewers are. First they benchmark Nvidia boost 2.0 cards without pre-heating, creating unrealistic testing conditions. Now that AMD has implemented a temperature-dependent boost, too, reviewers test AMDs quiet AND uber mode but only test Nvidias "quiet" (stock) mode, yet again creating an unfair comparison.