Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 270

Thread: Countdown to HCC Completion Thread!

  1. #51
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    727
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Maw View Post
    Just got more GPU WU's; was enjoying silky smooth computer too XD
    Something is skewed with your "WUs to be processed" cache. You should not run out of WUs in your cue for a short 2 to 6 hours server hiccup. There should be enough WUs in your cue(s) to go for 1.5 to 2 + days before exhausting your WUs to be processed cache(s). What are your present cache settings for that rig? (Min Work Buffer/Max Work Buffer)

    Go to your WCG/My Grid/Results Status webpage and select the "In Progress" option for rig in question. (Post the number of Pages of in Progress?) Fifteen WUs are displayed per pages. A single AMD high end video card should have 200 to 250 pages while a Xfire setup should have 475 to 550 pages of in Progress WUs. If your numbers are low try changing your cache settings. I use 2.10 / 0.15 for all of my rigs which seems to give me the max cache possible without running into the "Max number of WUs to be processed has been reached" snag.

    FYC,
    Jean-Guy


  2. #52
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by jeanguy2 View Post
    Something is skewed with your "WUs to be processed" cache. You should not run out of WUs in your cue for a short 2 to 6 hours server hiccup. There should be enough WUs in your cue(s) to go for 1.5 to 2 + days before exhausting your WUs to be processed cache(s). What are your present cache settings for that rig? (Min Work Buffer/Max Work Buffer)

    Go to your WCG/My Grid/Results Status webpage and select the "In Progress" option for rig in question. (Post the number of Pages of in Progress?) Fifteen WUs are displayed per pages. A single AMD high end video card should have 200 to 250 pages while a Xfire setup should have 475 to 550 pages of in Progress WUs. If your numbers are low try changing your cache settings. I use 2.10 / 0.15 for all of my rigs which seems to give me the max cache possible without running into the "Max number of WUs to be processed has been reached" snag.

    FYC,
    Jean-Guy
    I am running a 0 day cache to avoid an issue where WU's were getting returned late when running CPU with intermittent GPU.

    I have never actually run out of WU's on with a 0 day cache (yay old HW XD) so with HCC GPU project coming to a close soon it isn't worth fixing for me.


  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    390
    I set my cache to 2.10/.15 and ended up with 500 pages of In Progress WUs. If anyone wants to start hording WUs as the project winds down, here is your chance thanks to the above post by JG2.
    Last edited by 0ne.shot; 04-12-2013 at 10:36 PM.

  4. #54
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Western Canada
    Posts
    1,004
    Quote Originally Posted by jeanguy2 View Post
    Something is skewed with your "WUs to be processed" cache. You should not run out of WUs in your cue for a short 2 to 6 hours server hiccup. There should be enough WUs in your cue(s) to go for 1.5 to 2 + days before exhausting your WUs to be processed cache(s). What are your present cache settings for that rig? (Min Work Buffer/Max Work Buffer)

    Go to your WCG/My Grid/Results Status webpage and select the "In Progress" option for rig in question. (Post the number of Pages of in Progress?) Fifteen WUs are displayed per pages. A single AMD high end video card should have 200 to 250 pages while a Xfire setup should have 475 to 550 pages of in Progress WUs. If your numbers are low try changing your cache settings. I use 2.10 / 0.15 for all of my rigs which seems to give me the max cache possible without running into the "Max number of WUs to be processed has been reached" snag.


    FYC,
    Jean-Guy
    Strange Jean, as on all my 79xx machines if I go above 1 day min. (regardless of max.) my running w.u.'s go into "running high priority" mode. Which needless to say causes a lot of havoc on GPU W.U.'s.
    On the 7770 setup's any combination on min/max does not cause this issue?

  5. #55
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    I recently run into a similar problem. Have set my cache to 0.10 / 0.10 and now I have 501 pages of In Progress. The client is responding very slow now and some WUs are getting stuck after a while (don't know if this is because of so many WUs in cache). Has anyone experienced stuck WUs? I've been running without issues so far with 7950+7770, after replacing the 7770 with another 7950 such problems start to appear...

  6. #56
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    727
    Strange Jean, as on all my 79xx machines if I go above 1 day min. (regardless of max.) my running w.u.'s go into "running high priority" mode. Which needless to say causes a lot of havoc on GPU W.U.'s.
    On the 7770 setup's any combination on min/max does not cause this issue?
    Strange one JM, my 7970 & 7950 Xfire rigs are both using BOINC 7.0.56. The 7970 runs CAT 13.1 and the 7950 CAT 12.11 beta 4. Both of these rigs profile preferences are set to disallow CPU WUs. Confirm that your rigs have the same CPU setting. How many pending WUs do you have in your cache at present?


  7. #57
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    727
    I recently run into a similar problem. Have set my cache to 0.10 / 0.10 and now I have 501 pages of In Progress. The client is responding very slow now and some WUs are getting stuck after a while (don't know if this is because of so many WUs in cache). Has anyone experienced stuck WUs? I've been running without issues so far with 7950+7770, after replacing the 7770 with another 7950 such problems start to appear...
    Mumak, Suggest that you do a full uninstall of AMD CAT drivers and then re-install them. Select Xfire upon restart and then re-start BOINC. I also once experienced sluggish BOINC and windows 7 performance when I added Xfire card without doing full driver re-install. Are you getting an error readout with your stuck WUs? If so what is it?
    Last edited by jeanguy2; 04-14-2013 at 07:30 PM.


  8. #58
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Quote Originally Posted by jeanguy2 View Post
    Mumak, Suggest that you do a full uninstall of AMD CAT drivers and then re-install them. Select Xfire upon restart and then re-start BOINC. I also once experienced sluggish BOINC and windows 7 performance when I added Xfire card without doing full driver re-install. Are you getting an error readout with your stuck WUs? If so what is it?
    I did a complete CAT reinstall when I put the new card in, also enabled Xfire. Now I set it to No New Tasks, performed another reinstall + reboot, will see... Decreased from 16 WUs/GPU to 12/GPU. There are few errors per day of all sorts like "Invalid kernel name", "Kernel execution time estimate too high, exiting.", "Extracting GLCM features... ".
    What do you think, is it better to crunch in Xfire or not ? Not sure how Xfire is used for computing, but WUs are assigned to both GPUs in this config anyway, so theoretically it should not be needed to run in Xfire.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Western Canada
    Posts
    1,004
    Quote Originally Posted by jeanguy2 View Post
    Strange one JM, my 7970 & 7950 Xfire rigs are both using BOINC 7.0.56. The 7970 runs CAT 13.1 and the 7950 CAT 12.11 beta 4. Both of these rigs profile preferences are set to disallow CPU WUs. Confirm that your rigs have the same CPU setting. How many pending WUs do you have in your cache at present?
    Noticed this behavior many weeks ago and figured it was a normal glitch(for GPU wu's). Didn't think anything of it until your post, so I changed my config. to match yours and presto back to running high priority units.
    The three machines I'm referring to all have Cat. 13.1 using boinc vr. .042/.054
    WU's in progress is between 400-500 pages depending on machine. Pending validation is between 100-165 pages per machine. In the end there is lots of work in the Que., so all is well.

    BTW what is the max. number of wu's that are given out these days?

  10. #60
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Plymouth (UK)
    Posts
    5,279
    I don't think they changed it after the shutdown to upgrade their software because the previous limit was 1200 and I have >2000 just now on this slow rig. (Does around 1500/day)

    I never did determine whether that change for the outage was max 5000 wu's or 7500 wu's because their settings were:

    <daily_result_quota>500</daily_result_quota>cpu work
    <gpu_multiplier>15</gpu_multiplier>GPU work
    This would equate to 7500 per gpu
    <initial_daily_result_quota>5</initial_daily_result_quota>
    <max_wus_to_send>50</max_wus_to_send>per download tranch
    <max_wus_in_progress>500</max_wus_in_progress>cpu work
    <max_wus_in_progress_gpu>5000</max_wus_in_progress_gpu>GPU workThis would be 5000

    Your rig will calculate the time per wu then give you the number wu's in a day multiplied by the number you have entered as a minimum cache .... or at least that is the theory.

    I started incrementing by 0.1 today in order that I see where the max is before getting "priority" issues and having the cache as full as possible before the end of HCC.
    Last edited by OldChap; 04-14-2013 at 11:12 AM.


    My Biggest Fear Is When I die, My Wife Sells All My Stuff For What I Told Her I Paid For It.
    79 SB threads and 32 IB Threads across 4 rigs 111 threads Crunching!!

  11. #61
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Western Canada
    Posts
    1,004
    Thanks Old Chap. I was playing around a bit today and noticed on my 7970 rig that as soon as I went to .60/10 from .50/10 a couple of wu's went to high priority. Put it back to .5 min and priority is normal. Counted 6480 wu's in the Que on the 7970 rig.

    Also noted that on two identical 2600k platforms both running at 4600 Mhz as well, one using the Matrix 7970(1230Mhz) and the other an Asus 7950(1100Mhz) there was a vast difference in CPU usage that I can not understand(both running 24 wu's).

    Made sure both are running the the newest vr. of Boinc and using the same video driver, and not running other background tasks, then started boinc creating an offset between wu's. Machine #1 uses ~70% cpu while machine #2 is ~28% when no wu's are starting/finishing.

    So I look at task manager to see who is using up the CPU and notice that machine #1 is using 1-3% per thread up to 12% when wu's are transitioning. Machine #2 on the other hand seems to be barely working a sweat 0-1% per thread and up to 8% when transitioning.
    Strange

  12. #62
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Plymouth (UK)
    Posts
    5,279
    My settings just now are minimum work buffer 1.5 days and additional work buffer 0.1 days for a total of 2835

    Are these truly identical rigs?....same everything?

    If you have no wu's in starting/finishing phase at any one time then you maybe need to run more concurrent wu's

    Show your app_config please


    My Biggest Fear Is When I die, My Wife Sells All My Stuff For What I Told Her I Paid For It.
    79 SB threads and 32 IB Threads across 4 rigs 111 threads Crunching!!

  13. #63
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Western Canada
    Posts
    1,004
    I just find it odd there is such a difference between the two machines. Yes they are identical (except psu), although something is different and the only thing I haven't really looked into is the BIOS.

    The wu's will be bunching up real soon , I did one run on each machine for test purpose's before they bunch up.

    <app_config>
    <app>
    <name>hcc1</name>
    <max_concurrent>24</max_concurrent>
    <gpu_versions>
    <gpu_usage>0.0416</gpu_usage>
    <cpu_usage>0.3333</cpu_usage>
    </gpu_versions>
    </app>
    </app_config>

  14. #64
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    208
    Unless the server is down, I think WCG is out of HCC1 GPU tasks. One of my computers can't Update and get any more.


    "I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer" [Douglas Adams (11 March 1952 - 11 May 2001)]

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Unless the server is down, I think WCG is out of HCC1 GPU tasks. One of my computers can't Update and get any more.
    There have been several issues in the past few days with the servers giving out WUs. I hope this is the case this time!

  16. #66
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    208
    I've been preparing for this by adding tasks from other Projects on a minimum resource basis. I just didn't think I'd be using these preparations quite so soon.


    "I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer" [Douglas Adams (11 March 1952 - 11 May 2001)]

  17. #67
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Crab Nebula
    Posts
    493
    I've seen couple of those http server error messages today but they all seemed to have cleared up and I have full caches on all machines ATM.



    You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.

  18. #68
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    My queue is full again. Reminds of when you get to the last bit of ketchup in the bottle and it sputters a bit.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  19. #69
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Crab Nebula
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
    My queue is full again. Reminds of when you get to the last bit of ketchup in the bottle and it sputters a bit.
    When that happens I usually store the bottle upside down to get it all to the top. Wonder if that works with 'puters?



    You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by nanoprobe View Post
    When that happens I usually store the bottle upside down to get it all to the top. Wonder if that works with 'puters?
    I flipped my case upside down. Now we wait to see if it works the same as Ketchup! Only time will tell.

  21. #71
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by nanoprobe View Post
    When that happens I usually store the bottle upside down to get it all to the top. Wonder if that works with 'puters?
    I did that with my last DIY computer and found the screw driver I thought I'd lost.


    "I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer" [Douglas Adams (11 March 1952 - 11 May 2001)]

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    390
    Time is winding down. There are an estimated 8 days of new WUs remaining. Time to crank everything up to 12.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    935
    Just 8 days? Lets see if that is enough.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,608
    Well, with summer coming I was going to have to tone it down some anyways. I have a large amount of photos I need to get cracking on editing and organizing too. Pretty good timing. Maybe the "new project" will start just in time for the cooler months.
    24/7 Cruncher #1
    Crosshair VII Hero, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 AIO, 4x8GB GSKILL 3600MHz C15, ASUS TUF 3090 OC
    Samsung 980 1TB NVMe, Samsung 870 QVO 1TB, 2x10TB WD Red RAID1, Win 10 Pro, Enthoo Luxe TG, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2

    24/7 Cruncher #2
    ASRock X470 Taichi, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer 280 AIO, 2x16GB GSKILL NEO 3600MHz C16, EVGA 3080ti FTW3 Ultra
    Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe, Samsung 870 EVO 500GBWin 10 Ent, Enthoo Pro, Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850W

    24/7 Cruncher #3
    GA-P67A-UD4-B3 BIOS F8 mod, 2600k (L051B138) @ 4.5 GHz, 1.260v full load, Arctic Liquid 120, (Boots Win @ 5.6 GHz per Massman binning)
    Samsung Green 4x4GB @2133 C10, EVGA 2080ti FTW3 Hybrid, Samsung 870 EVO 500GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Rosewill Rise, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W G2

    24/7 Cruncher #4 ... Crucial M225 64GB SSD Donated to Endurance Testing (Died at 968 TB of writes...no that is not a typo!)
    GA-EP45T-UD3LR BIOS F10 modded, Q6600 G0 VID 1.212 (L731B536), 3.6 GHz 9x400 @ 1.312v full load, Zerotherm Zen FZ120
    OCZ 2x2GB DDR3-1600MHz C7, Gigabyte 7950 @1200/1250, Crucial MX100 128GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Centurion 590, XFX PRO650W

    Music System
    SB Server->SB Touch w/Android Tablet as a remote->Denon AVR-X3300W->JBL Studio Series Floorstanding Speakers, JBL LS Center, 2x SVS SB-2000 Subs


  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by bluestang View Post
    Well, with summer coming I was going to have to tone it down some anyways. I have a large amount of photos I need to get cracking on editing and organizing too. Pretty good timing. Maybe the "new project" will start just in time for the cooler months.
    Oh, I can do the photo thing for you. In fact, I'll take the 300mm f/4 off your hands for no charge.

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •