To the people complaining about benchmarks run at 1920x1080, most gamers are at that resolution. That is NOT "cherry picking", that's more like "we have limited time, lets put up the numbers that matter to the largest portion of the community as possible". I can say without a doubt that I don't physically (as in someone who lives close enough for me to go hang out with) know a single person who owns a monitor capable of higher than 1920x1200.

I can honestly say I have no intention of jumping to 2560x1600 any time soon, considering monitor pricing and the fact that gpu horse power doesn't last nearly as long presently at said resolution. Not saying that sites shouldn't use those numbers in their full on reviews, but those numbers are definitely not as important to the majority of the costumer base in comparison to 1920x1080. As such, if you only have time to show one resolution, you'd be foolish NOT to choose 1080p.