Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
@Informal : I used hardware.fr reference because I knew that you used it for your speculation chart on your blog, I thought we have a similar reference. But anyway, no problem, go back on topic as FlanK3r said
Yeah I know mate,but the thing is they changed their methodology after FX launched so I can't directly compare the "new" results with their older average numbers.If you look here , FX is generally around 9-11% or so faster than 1100T in apps and games . It is even more faster with apps and games in low res. ( 11% vs 9% for high resolution in computerbase.de tests).

On topic of PD. If Piledriver launches (big IF) at around 4.1-4.2Ghz base clock and IF it gets ~3-5% IPC improvement versus bdver1(IPC being very moot point since it varies wildly with different workloads of course),then PD might land at 17-22% faster than 8150,a very good improvement which might put it at 2700K level in the "new" hardware.fr overall score testing chart. 2700K overall is very close to 980x.