SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm

[Computurd]

well offhand i would comment on the parameters of the Trace used. Including compressibility of data, in which SF will look great. Also, intentional high loadings set up by the tester (by his own admission). so he did a two week trace, and intentionally loaded it up in the first place.
Then he runs it back fast, creating even higher loadings in my opinion. (well for sure, your running two weeks of stuff in a short time).

so unrealistic would be my initial impression. Same methodology as Anand.
I will read further shortly.

http://www.behardware.com/articles/8...l-510-320.html

select the correct test from the list above the chart, it will change the results so you can see them.



here is another one



here is another set of tests that i find telling;

http://www.techau.tv/blog/ssd-shaked...vs-crucial-m4/



look at the access time.
latency as follows:

SF- .284
M4- .076

so.....seriously off topic here, but at low QD the SF are not great with latency. and normal people will be at low QD almost constantly. just brain candy...latency is measured as a function of 4K@QD1, and the M4 is much much better. not only with incompressible, but with incompressible as well.

interesting that there are very few tests with low 4K QD on SF drives out there. i mean very very few. At least published of course. Even Anand will only test 4k @ QD3 which is ridiculous.