MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 267

Thread: AMD FX "Bulldozer" Review - (4) !exclusive! Excuse for 1-Threaded Perf.

Threaded View

  1. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    393
    Quote Originally Posted by dess View Post
    So you're willing to play at 640x480?

    ps. you don't need 120 fps for 120 Hz, if your goal is 3D. The GPU will render to two framebuffers at any rate and it's the two buffers that will be alternated at 120 Hz.

    so for you the only options are 640x480 or 1920x1080?!
    and I thought this was a forum for enthusiasts, that care to explore the CPU performance in more ways, than saying "it's enough for my games", because the real word is far more complex than that, you have a lot of different games and situations within the game, and by lowering some settings you can more or less simulate a faster VGA on higher settings, or simply use it as a more valid CPU benchmark,
    if you are willing to test OC and fine tuning gains I also think its valid to lower the settings and observe the gains more easily,

    I'm not saying that testing on these settings have no use, what I'm saying is, how much time does it take to run one or 2 more settings since you already have all running? 3 minutes? so why not? its more information,

    I'm not talking about 3d, I'm talking about using a 120Hz screen with vsync on,

    and I'm just curious to see what happens when the GPU impact is lower and the CPU impact higher,

    also when talking about price, don't forget the 2500k...

    I'm also curious about 4m/8c vs 4m/4c, from what I see on the other pages only 2m/4c vs 4m/4c was tested,

    anyway, thanks for the tests, but that's just my opinion.
    Last edited by Spectrobozo; 10-19-2011 at 09:36 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •