Quote Originally Posted by Opteron146 View Post
You surely missed Llano .. that is K10@32nm.
From what I read, the process is still not matured enough to put out a new architecture on it (I read somewhere that there might be yeald issues with it), but these might be fake rumors.

By the looks of it, BD needed the smaller process to allow for higher clocks with the same TDP (it would have been bad for them to release BD, with these clocks on 45nm and have a TDP of 150+, specially on a marketed-less-power-the-better environment).