Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
The main problem is the 32 nm process tech which is not matured enough and there is a capacity problem too. I think both of these issues will be solved in few months.
It's always difficult to start a brand new microarchitecture on a brand new and complex (SOI + gate first HKMG) process tech.
So, AMD shouldn't have done it this way, should have used Intel tic-toc strategy: new architecture on matured process, new process on matured architecture. Would clearly make things smoother. If they had transitioned ph 2 a couple of months ago to 32 nm, they could have improved its lifecycle a bit and now would be releasing BD with the process sorted out.

But, this doesn't matter anymore. Just waiting on BD to make a decision on which way to go for my new rig (and, I'm leaning for AMD this time).