Results 1 to 25 of 5495

Thread: SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,608
    M225->Vertex Turbo 64GB Update:

    335 TiB (368.33 TB) total
    973.13 hours
    7203 Raw Wear
    110.68 MB/s avg for the last 65.15 hours (on W7 x64)
    MD5 OK
    C4-Erase Failure Block Count (Realloc Sectors) at 4
    (Bank 6/Block 2406; Bank 3/Block 3925; Bank 0/Block 1766; Bank 0/Block 829)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CDI-M225-OCZ-VERTEX-TURBO-09.19.2011.PNG 
Views:	2166 
Size:	58.5 KB 
ID:	120243

    I'm really impressed on the write speed of this old Indilinx drive from beginning to end of loop...
    Beginning of loop:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LoopBeg.png 
Views:	2163 
Size:	27.8 KB 
ID:	120244

    Middle of loop:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LoopMid.png 
Views:	2184 
Size:	26.8 KB 
ID:	120245

    End of loop
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LoopEnd.png 
Views:	2155 
Size:	26.9 KB 
ID:	120246
    24/7 Cruncher #1
    Crosshair VII Hero, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 AIO, 4x8GB GSKILL 3600MHz C15, ASUS TUF 3090 OC
    Samsung 980 1TB NVMe, Samsung 870 QVO 1TB, 2x10TB WD Red RAID1, Win 10 Pro, Enthoo Luxe TG, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2

    24/7 Cruncher #2
    ASRock X470 Taichi, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer 280 AIO, 2x16GB GSKILL NEO 3600MHz C16, EVGA 3080ti FTW3 Ultra
    Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe, Samsung 870 EVO 500GBWin 10 Ent, Enthoo Pro, Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850W

    24/7 Cruncher #3
    GA-P67A-UD4-B3 BIOS F8 mod, 2600k (L051B138) @ 4.5 GHz, 1.260v full load, Arctic Liquid 120, (Boots Win @ 5.6 GHz per Massman binning)
    Samsung Green 4x4GB @2133 C10, EVGA 2080ti FTW3 Hybrid, Samsung 870 EVO 500GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Rosewill Rise, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W G2

    24/7 Cruncher #4 ... Crucial M225 64GB SSD Donated to Endurance Testing (Died at 968 TB of writes...no that is not a typo!)
    GA-EP45T-UD3LR BIOS F10 modded, Q6600 G0 VID 1.212 (L731B536), 3.6 GHz 9x400 @ 1.312v full load, Zerotherm Zen FZ120
    OCZ 2x2GB DDR3-1600MHz C7, Gigabyte 7950 @1200/1250, Crucial MX100 128GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Centurion 590, XFX PRO650W

    Music System
    SB Server->SB Touch w/Android Tablet as a remote->Denon AVR-X3300W->JBL Studio Series Floorstanding Speakers, JBL LS Center, 2x SVS SB-2000 Subs


  2. #2
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by bluestang View Post
    M225->Vertex Turbo 64GB Update:

    335 TiB (368.33 TB) total
    973.13 hours
    7203 Raw Wear
    110.68 MB/s avg for the last 65.15 hours (on W7 x64)
    MD5 OK
    C4-Erase Failure Block Count (Realloc Sectors) at 4
    (Bank 6/Block 2406; Bank 3/Block 3925; Bank 0/Block 1766; Bank 0/Block 829)

    I'm really impressed on the write speed of this old Indilinx drive from beginning to end of loop...
    Beginning of loop:
    I ran my 60GB Agility for about 8 hours, and it wasn't nearly so fast, but still fast in it's own right, and still fast for a 64GB drive:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ASU and CDI  2337GB IO writes Agility60.jpg 
Views:	2183 
Size:	318.2 KB 
ID:	120250

    The big difference is the move from Samsung to Intel NAND.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    211
    Really amazing that the Indilinx just keeps on going. I expected it to have died by now etc.

  4. #4
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by bulanula View Post
    Really amazing that the Indilinx just keeps on going. I expected it to have died by now etc.
    With TRIM, I'd expect the M225 -> Vertex Turbo to last as long as (at least) as the M4.

    The only problem with the Indilinx controller is poor 4K performance. OCZ claims they're going to release their Arrowana FW for Indilinx's with Intel NAND, and that 4K performance will be increased 500%.

    I think that same poor 4K performance will end up making the Turbo last longer in this test.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •