So to it can be rearranged to the abbreviation of the words "do not answer?" I'm glad we've reached an agreement my friend.Yes, it's an anagram of DNA. What did I win ?
Except that movie-man said he "thinks" they have a winner, and didn't specify (name) any benches where the product fails/wins. Right? Right. You can gladly correct me if I'm wrong.For me, it's the same thing as movieman (or whatever his name) saying that AMD has a winner etc...
I've enjoyed participating in this intelligent discussion.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks