Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
You have seen "it". The vrzone and now coolaler posted same results. "This" means slower than Thuban or barely matching Thuban. And I use 8150 for comparison,not 8120. Granted there are some cases where 8150 with this level of performance will still probably spank 1100T,but nothing like the projections from December last year showed. Where is the double-sized SMT capable FlexFP performance? Where is the HPC improvement that is quoted for server parts gone? Remember we are left to think that even in legacy code server parts will be ~50% faster with same clocks as previous MC cores. This equates to around 10% better per core performance in SIMD workloads. All Zambezi leaks thus far show no such thing . On the contrary they show very poor performance of this "powerful double-sized FPU".
I'm lost. Maybe because the thread is over 100 pages, lol. Which coolaler benchmarks are you talking about? Can you link them? Are you talking about those benchs with 760G (or some crappy chipset like that) or maybe I missed something?

The CB11.5 tests with that chipset were in the 5.5 points range o something like that, really low. But "he who shall not be named" got 6.9 points in CB11.5 with 8150 stock. Anyway, I don't like that score either but we shouldn't jump to conclusions.