One would expect wear range delta to be higher with static data but the opposite is true so far. My SF-1200 is ~63% full with static data and my wear range delta shrunk when I added it. You have nearly 0 static data and yours continues to grow. With static data, NAND seems to be evenly used; without static data, NAND doesn't seem to be evenly used.

It's almost like it expects static data as it tries to do wear leveling.

Hard to know the effects of wear range delta...we don't know the units. Is it a percentage between 90th percentile usage and 10th percentile usage? Is it P/E cycles difference between 99th percentile usage and 1st percentile usage? If it's just P/E cycles between most used and least used, a difference of 23 cycles between least and most isn't a big deal when the average is 688 (as yours is now). If it's 23% wear difference between most/least, that's pretty notable and probably will have an effect on endurance. If it's 23% difference between 90th and 10th percentile, that could be really bad for endurance.

Also of note from your F40-A, LTT hasn't kicked in yet even though ~20% of your NAND's minimum rated lifetime has been used in less than a dozen days. Seems lifetime was set for something very short, maybe even impossibly short (basically deactivating LTT). And even if it kicks in, write speeds may not drop that much.