The Intel 320 40GB has 48GiB of NAND? Hmmm, that would put its WA at like 1.2x, which I find odd (being worse than the X25-V). Could that have been as a trade for speed compared to the X25-V? Does it really need 28.8% (37.27GiB usable on 48GiB NAND) spare area?
Either way, 48GiB of NAND changes the charts.
C300 Update:
62.53TiB, 79 MWI, 1052 raw wear indicator, 61.85MiB/sec, MD5 OK
![]()




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks