Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
A 40GB Intel 320 has six 8GiB flash packages on its circuit board. I think that five of them are used normally (five channels of the controller), and the sixth is used for the RAID-4 like XOR parity. So that would be 8GiB extra flash.
The Intel 320 40GB has 48GiB of NAND? Hmmm, that would put its WA at like 1.2x, which I find odd (being worse than the X25-V). Could that have been as a trade for speed compared to the X25-V? Does it really need 28.8% (37.27GiB usable on 48GiB NAND) spare area?

Either way, 48GiB of NAND changes the charts.

C300 Update:

62.53TiB, 79 MWI, 1052 raw wear indicator, 61.85MiB/sec, MD5 OK

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	62_53t.PNG 
Views:	1602 
Size:	130.6 KB 
ID:	117799