MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 5495

Thread: SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    C300 evening update, plus a new chart to add to the mix.

    41.787TiB, 86MWI, 702 P/E cycles (raw wear indicator), all MD5 okay, 81.7MiB/sec

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	41_787t.PNG 
Views:	1742 
Size:	130.4 KB 
ID:	117638


    New chart!

    Approximate Write Amplification

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Jul13WriteAmp.png 
Views:	1673 
Size:	19.1 KB 
ID:	117639

    Using the normalized writes (total GiB written / total NAND capacity), raw wear indicators (Samsung and Crucials), and raw wear inferences for Intel ( (100-MWI) x 50 / normalized writes ), I came up with a chart for approximate write amplification during testing. Not sure how useful it is, ultimately, but it seems interesting

    Only value I'm unsure of is the X25-V, it may have 10k cycle NAND, in which case it's WA would be 2x what is shown as I calculated with the assumption of 5k cycle NAND.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Only value I'm unsure of is the X25-V, it may have 10k cycle NAND, in which case it's WA would be 2x what is shown as I calculated with the assumption of 5k cycle NAND.
    Also, the Samsung is a guess, since we are not certain that SMART attribute 177 is actually erase cycles on the flash. I think it probably is, but if it gets to 20,000 and the SSD is still going fine, I will start to have more doubts....

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •