That's what I get then for having gathered most of info back in 2010 when they were calling them modules stillI do admit to having created some self-confusion between Bulldozer and Bobcat modules. I had thought that a module of either was 2 cores, but Bobcat is only a single, which makes sense given the single core APUs. And yea, my terminology of "physical" is indeed not quite correct, which Logical should be actually used. My only reason for using it would be to more easily differentiate between a multi-threaded single-core (HyperThreading) and single threaded core-multi CPU.
I was also under the impression current Bobcats were K10.5, but now I'm seeing it be referred to as K14. CPU-Z is in line with that, though strangely Windows7 is not, showing actually a family number of 20 for the E350 >_> lol That might be because of the Stars and in that time it's gotten corrected *shrug* It's hard when the manufacture isn't giving any info heh Not that I don't blame them though, just sucks for us lol
I'll shop you up a good one here on what I mean that it's easy to do.
Didn't mean for it to sound that way, just meant that is what I've been reading the past few months on the net.
Good info to know, thanks![]()






I do admit to having created some self-confusion between Bulldozer and Bobcat modules. I had thought that a module of either was 2 cores, but Bobcat is only a single, which makes sense given the single core APUs. And yea, my terminology of "physical" is indeed not quite correct, which Logical should be actually used. My only reason for using it would be to more easily differentiate between a multi-threaded single-core (HyperThreading) and single threaded core-multi CPU.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks