That doesn't mean anything. It doesn't display the Multi or HTT, so it could be overclocked for all we knowBut 3220, according to what I'm seeing, is correct for 3.2GHz; 2.8GHz would be 2820.
My guess is due to it not reporting how many multiples for the cache there are, IE:
8 x 16KB
4 x 64KB
4 x 2048KB
But, I'm just basing that off what it reports for my Bobcat and in all likelihood isn't right :\
Unless it's that engineering samples show up as single core, and that is why it doesn't indicate their cache multiples, thus 8 then being incorrect...
(doubt the Processor #1 being shaded is your reason, as again my Bobcat's is and it's dual-core)





But 3220, according to what I'm seeing, is correct for 3.2GHz; 2.8GHz would be 2820.
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks