Page 12 of 181 FirstFirst ... 291011121314152262112 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 4519

Thread: AMD Zambezi news, info, fans !

  1. #276
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenkura View Post


    Don't know if it's a fake or not

  2. #277
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    504
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenkura View Post
    Link is not working.
    IQ_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL

    outdated hardware

  3. #278

  4. #279
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunfire View Post
    Link is not working.
    Here you go:

    http://pic2.178.com/64/641528/month_...1a9dc57455.jpg

  5. #280
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Don't know if it's a fake or not
    Only one core and one thread, what's up with that? Very fishy if you ask me...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  6. #281
    Devil kept pokin'
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Kakalaky
    Posts
    1,299
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Only one core and one thread, what's up with that? Very fishy if you ask me...
    Id imagine cpuz is going to need to be tweaked to identify cores in the new modular setup AMD has going.

  7. #282
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Only one core , one thread and two processors ,what's up with that? Very fishy if you ask me...


    Don't know if it's legit or not, maybe Franck D. knows something

  8. #283
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post


    Don't know if it's a fake or not
    I say it is, as far as I know only modules could be enabled/disabled, and with a module being two cores your core count will be an even number - not one. On the other hand, take note that the CPU selection box is available meaning there are multiple CPUs installed - that fits in with the 16GB RAM (server, a home user doesn't really need 16GB) so maye CPU-Z can't detect core count?
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  9. #284
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    If we don't know how this CPU-Z version interprets a BD, we can't tell if it's fake or not. We can keep on guessing but it won't lead us nowhere.

  10. #285
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    This is essentially a rumour thread
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  11. #286
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101 View Post
    This is essentially a rumour thread
    Of course, but a version of CPU-Z that doesn't support BD won't make any rumours, only confusion.
    You can't interpret the info in a good way if the info is all wrong from the beginning, especially when it's about the first CPU with modules.

    If it was just a dumb shrink of a X6 then CPU-Z probably have made less errors, just like in the past when the first K8 on a new process showed up, for instance.

  12. #287
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Seems CPU-Z doesn't work properly with BD :



    edit : source Pcinlife
    Last edited by Olivon; 04-23-2011 at 07:52 AM.

  13. #288
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by slaveondope View Post
    lol ASRock portraying 1960's Mini Cooper for AM3 and some kind of ferrari render as AM3+
    Smile

  14. #289
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Next week to release R11.5 scores
    http://we.pcinlife.com/forum-redirec...-30924734.html

    Flank3r must be happy

  15. #290
    Devil kept pokin'
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Kakalaky
    Posts
    1,299
    From above^




  16. #291
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Still not convinced, no other ES has ever shown that way.
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  17. #292
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    hehe, right, Im happy, but its hard show todays news at mobile internet EDGE conection :-D (this weekend Im off my normal net conection)

    btw, where is Cinebenxh score :-D?
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  18. #293
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101 View Post
    Still not convinced, no other ES has ever shown that way.
    Llano's ES shows 4 processors, each having 1 core on CPU-Z

    If the guy shows the processor submenu, there's probably going to be 6 processors.

  19. #294
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    http://www.asrock.com/news/events/2011AM3+/
    lol ASRock portraying 1960's Mini Cooper for AM3 and some kind of ferrari render as AM3+
    I fell off my chair laughing at that too mate:
    ROFL @ AsRock


    1)- The sockets black - OMG! - The pin holes are larger too LOL!
    2)- Since when did the power link need speed? Can tweak that on my CH4 (supports better power management - first thing an OC'er switches off )
    3)- Environmentally friendly?! Errr ok
    4)- Less CPU noise? - Errrr ok too (Ain't that what LLC etc is for?)
    5)- Higher current support? - (Sure my CH IV can beat that )
    6)- New Bracket makes the CPU cooler!!!!! - anything you say ASRock

    Sick stunt by asrock - Allot of maybe's and the rest is rubbish which any overclocker would switch off. Just because they're AM3 boards 'may not' support the other one decent mentioned feature doesn't mean that others can't.

    UEFI - Now that's interesting! - If it supports BIOS boot in less than 2 secs
    Please do correct me if i'm wrong on any of this!
    Last edited by zoomee; 04-23-2011 at 12:56 PM.
    4960X@4.7 | Asus RIVF | 16Gb@2400 | 256Gb 840 Pro | R9 290 | AX-860W | 540Air | Custom W/C

  20. #295
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by blindbox View Post
    Llano's ES shows 4 processors, each having 1 core on CPU-Z

    If the guy shows the processor submenu, there's probably going to be 6 processors.
    I was talking about the CPU ID string
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  21. #296
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101 View Post
    I was talking about the CPU ID string
    That's whatever AMD programs in. It's probably specific to an internal code that AMD uses for testing, ie which line it was produced on at a certain wing of a factory, date, time week, revision etc. It might even be a type of "watermark" that identifies the CPUs owner during testing. Which may or may not be used to pinpoint folks who break NDA's etc
    ASRock X399 Fatal1ty
    1950x Threadripper
    32gb DDR4
    GTX 1070
    __________________________________________________ ____

  22. #297
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by zoomee View Post
    I fell off my chair laughing at that too mate:
    ROFL @ AsRock

    1)- The sockets black - OMG! - The pin holes are larger too LOL!
    I actually have had a hard time getting CPUs in after I bent pins and straighted them out, when you manually straighten 50 pins and they arent perfect...well...

    2)- Since when did the power link need speed? Can tweak that on my CH4 (supports better power management - first thing an OC'er switches off )
    This and 50% LLC are why I'm trading some unused stuff for a CHIV Formula right now to replace my M4A89TD...

    3)- Environmentally friendly?! Errr ok
    lol

    4)- Less CPU noise? - Errrr ok too (Ain't that what LLC etc is for?)
    They are talking about power ripple, cleaner power...noise is sort of another term for ripple though they are two separate things...why does that matter if you already have a PSU like Seasonic that is clean already? Beats me.

    5)- Higher current support? - (Sure my CH IV can beat that )
    1.4v x 110= 140w, so I dont know whats up with that...I guess they are saying that AM3 only needs to be able to deliver 140w to be in spec. A lot of us I think are up in the 250w range so no need to worry

    6)- New Bracket makes the CPU cooler!!!!! - anything you say ASRock
    Well if you run the stock cooler I get what they are saying. Normal bracket cuts a little bit of air off near the core where quite a bit of the air comes out. I can see it making a 2-3c difference actually. Too bad this is ASRock exclusive and will warp the boards awfully bad...

    Sick stunt by asrock - Allot of maybe's and the rest is rubbish which any overclocker would switch off. Just because they're AM3 boards 'may not' support the other one decent mentioned feature doesn't mean that others can't.

    UEFI - Now that's interesting! - If it supports BIOS boot in less than 2 secs
    Please do correct me if i'm wrong on any of this!
    UEFI currently is buggy on a lot of boards from what I read. I dont think its required anyway
    My responses above
    Smile

  23. #298
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    4)- Less CPU noise? - Errrr ok too (Ain't that what LLC etc is for?)
    They are talking about power ripple, cleaner power...noise is sort of another term for ripple though they are two separate things...why does that matter if you already have a PSU like Seasonic that is clean already? Beats me.
    Not quite. The similarity is that both affect the waveform of the current, but that's it really. Remember that noise is a harsh, unwanted waveform in sound? The top is ripple, the bottom noise:



    Sorry it's not very neat, I did it in mspaint quickly. As for why you want a board to deliver clean power, well what's the use of a clean input to the PWMs if the output is dirty? A clean input is good for your board, a clean output is good for your CPU.
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  24. #299
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye4077 View Post
    That's whatever AMD programs in. It's probably specific to an internal code that AMD uses for testing, ie which line it was produced on at a certain wing of a factory, date, time week, revision etc. It might even be a type of "watermark" that identifies the CPUs owner during testing. Which may or may not be used to pinpoint folks who break NDA's etc
    I just find it odd that it's different to the other ES AMD chips I have. COMPLETELY different
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  25. #300
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Oj101 View Post
    Not quite. The similarity is that both affect the waveform of the current, but that's it really. Remember that noise is a harsh, unwanted waveform in sound? The top is ripple, the bottom noise:



    Sorry it's not very neat, I did it in mspaint quickly. As for why you want a board to deliver clean power, well what's the use of a clean input to the PWMs if the output is dirty? A clean input is good for your board, a clean output is good for your CPU.
    correct Im waiting for Cross V F
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

Page 12 of 181 FirstFirst ... 291011121314152262112 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •