Page 2 of 18 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 449

Thread: GTX 590 reviews

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Italia
    Posts
    1,021

  2. #27

  3. #28
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
    I just read the Guru3D and Hardware Canucks review and both reviews showed different results, the Guru3D showed the GTX 590 was in lead in most games while the Hardware Canucks showed the GTX 590 was slower than the 6990 in most games.
    Differet strokes for different folks.

    Honestly, it's next to impossible to equate one review with another.

  4. #29

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    So near, yet so far.
    Posts
    737
    [[Daily R!G]]
    Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz w/ 1.325 vcore.
    Rampage II Gene||CM HAF 932||HX850||MSI GTX 660ti PE OC||Corsair H50||G.Skill Phoenix 3 240GB||G.Skill NQ 6x2GB||Samsung 2333SW

    flickr

  6. #31
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    758
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...0,2898-17.html

    Hahah, it's ridiculous how loud the Radeon 6990 is. Move to the four minute mark, start the 590 clip, then the 6990 clip
    Last edited by keiths; 03-24-2011 at 05:23 AM.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrea deluxe View Post
    Where's the facepalm emoticon when you need it?

    From all of the reviewer's guides I have read, every one of them indicates NOT to push voltage past 1.1V with the reference heatsink. There's overclocking and then there's something like that which shouldn't be done ON THE STOCK COOLER.

    But to each their own I guess. But it's sad to see cards dying without OCP kicking in.
    Last edited by SKYMTL; 03-24-2011 at 05:26 AM.

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrea deluxe View Post
    No limit to 1.13-1.15v in the bios?or just a unlocked review card?
    I find it odd the 4xx-5xx cards all were limited to these ranges but not the 590?
    _________________

  10. #35

  11. #36

  12. #37
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072
    It's not about the cooling SKYMTL, the PWM is too weak, just as it is on the GTX 570. Two GTX 590 died the same way here, one in our test lab and one in a demo system of a reseller, both not overclocked or overvolted; Nvidia says some faulty components not found on retail parts caused it, but both us and TPU had retail package GTX 590's.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Its not a great card similar to the 6990 in performance and by that i mean some reviews will say 6990 is faster other will say the opposite. Now coming to the card it does not really deserve the fastest card award because its not always faster than the 6990 but given the GTX 580 costs around $480 and the 590 costs $700, i would consider it more value for money with respect to overclocking.

    I for one would get a pair of 6950's if i had dual PCIE's or a GTX 590 if i had one PCIE "Who uses 1 now a days"
    Coming Soon

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany, Stuttgart
    Posts
    549
    Conclusion of all reviews...fail!


  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    324
    I liked sweclockers.com review the most, even had a video when the 590 got smoked... anandtechs is also ok but to many graphs, why not have avg and min frames/sec in the same graph?
    E6600"L630A446"? @3600@1.?v cooled by Tunic Tower sitting on Abit AB9 Quad GT played on ASUS 8800GTX opperated by a lazy slacker!

  16. #41
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    442
    It's an innovative card. If I had to guess, AMD may go for a "6990 rev. 2" with a quieter cooler. What Nvidia has done in respect to acoustics is great. That being said, the general consensus is that that the 6990 is faster. On the games where Nvidia has put tons of optimization into it, it's obvious as Nvidia's 590 beats the 6990 by a healthy margin. However, when the games are on designed indifferently or in favor of AMD's solutions, The HD 6990 wipes out the GTX 590 by 20-25%, in some cases the 6990's minimum is actually higher than the GTX 590's average. At higher resolutions, it looks like AMD did the right thing by incorporating 2GB of frame buffer per GPU.

    If AMD could simply get the fan noise under control, AMD would have the clear winner. As it stands, HD 6990 is the fastest card in the world, while the GTX 590 is quieter and has the better feature set.

    The End.
    PII 965BE @ 3.8Ghz /|\ TRUE 120 w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan /|\ XFX HD 5870 /|\ 4GB G.Skill 1600mhz DDR3 /|\ Gigabyte 790GPT-UD3H /|\ Two lovely 24" monitors (1920x1200) /|\ and a nice leather chair.

  17. #42

    Exclamation ...

    From what I can see the higher you go with resolution and AA, the more Radeon 6990 outperforms GTX590.

    Though honestly why buys such cards to play below Full HD and AAx4 & AAx8?



    That way I guess Radeon remains as the king of the hill closely followed by GTX590? Some people may choose one or the other based only on brand preference.

  18. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6
    Can we keep a running total on the 6990 vs 590? Its quite interesting as it seems to swing one way then the other. TPU blowing up was quite funny! Woul dbe interested to see reviewers usinf the 11.4 drivers if only for this supposed civV improvement.

    590 (2):
    Bit-tech
    Guru3d

    Draw (4):
    Toms
    Hardwarecanucks (undecided on this one)
    xbit
    chiphell

    6990 (2):
    Hexus
    TPU
    Last edited by Little_Beasts; 03-24-2011 at 06:08 AM.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadov View Post
    From what I can see the higher you go with resolution and AA, the more Radeon 6990 outperforms GTX590.

    Though honestly why buys such cards to play below Full HD and AAx4 & AAx8?



    That way I guess Radeon remains as the king of the hill closely followed by GTX590? Some people may choose one or the other based only on brand preference.
    on launch day drivers this card did very well IMHO

    In the tpu review it was a tie @ 1920 x1280 3% off the 6990 at 2050x1220.
    amd cant fix how loud the card is but nv can work on the drivers.

    the 590 blowing on vid pillo-kun mentioned not too much drama but its worth a see
    http://www.sweclockers.com/nyhet/137...boven-i-dramat

    the guys text says its the drivers?
    High-performance graphics card Geforce GTX 590 balances on the verge of what is practically possible to handle in terms of power consumption and heat development. Even worse is the situation when overclocking.
    In order not to risk the components damaged are blocks built in drivers to say from when limit values are exceeded. SweClockers testers Jonas Eriksson tells what happened when the graphics card you take 12 000 SEK went up in smoke.
    The first graphics card gave up the spirit when I user overclockable with the increase of the voltage to the GPU. I was thinking not so much more on it, after all things that can happen and there are always Monday specimens, in particular as regards the early "samples".
    Shortly afterwards snappade Andreas up more suffered the same misfortune and we decided to explore it all together with Nvidia.
    An additional video card had to be sacrificed in order to come to the conclusion that it is driver 267.52, which is the culprit. The experiment was repeated with newer 267.71 and then worked Nvidias safeguards that they would.The essence of it all is to install the latest software from Nvidias website and at all costs avoid the driver that is included in the box, which is precisely the wrong version 267.52. The who plan to overclock should also make sure that you have good ventilation in the chassis and be aware that your warranty is if frequencies are increased over specifications.
    Last edited by cowie; 03-24-2011 at 06:18 AM.
    _________________

  20. #45
    Noob Overclocker
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kringe in die bos
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    on launch day drivers this card did very well IMHO

    In the tpu review it was a tie @ 1920 x1280 3% off the 6990 at 2050x1220.
    amd cant fix how loud the card is but nv can work on the drivers.
    Goes both ways I guess. AMD have a history of improving performance with new drivers, so the 6990 will get faster, but stay just as loud.
    Zombie Killer Corsair 700D with Quad Rad mod+240 rad mod/Asus Maximus III Formula/i5 750 @ 4Ghz/8GB GSkill Trident/HIS HD 6990/Dell u2711/120GB Kingston SSD Now!/All under EK watercooling goodness!
    HTPC Lian Li V354B/i5 750/4GB Corsair/MSI HD5770/60GB GSkill Phoenix/Corsair H50/EVGA P55 Micro SLi

  21. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    38
    Any test with 11.4 R2?
    Obsidian 800D - i7 2600k@H70 - HIS HD6990 - Sapphire HD6970 CF - Aquacomputer XT Ultra - 2xCrucial C300 64GB Raid 0 - Gigabyte P67A-UD7 - Corsair Vengeance 8GB 8C - Coolermaster Silent PRO Gold 1200W - 3x24" Eyefinity 5760x1200


  22. #47
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Micutzu View Post
    It's not about the cooling SKYMTL, the PWM is too weak, just as it is on the GTX 570. Two GTX 590 died the same way here, one in our test lab and one in a demo system of a reseller, both not overclocked or overvolted; Nvidia says some faulty components not found on retail parts caused it, but both us and TPU had retail package GTX 590's.

    Funny, I have talked to several reviewers about this and out of the ~13 cards we all have, none has died in situations where the default voltage was adhered to...

    Methinks something is going on there in Europe.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by RacingTurtle View Post
    Goes both ways I guess. AMD have a history of improving performance with new drivers.

    They do? That's news to me. Usually they are fixing items broken in the last release.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by tnc99 View Post
    Any test with 11.4 R2?
    done, not much inc on game or bench

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    They do? That's news to me. Usually they are fixing items broken in the last release.
    When I got my 5870, I was able to run Dirt 2 w/ 4xAA and all settings maxed at 1920x1200. I got an average of 50-55 FPS. Now, from the Cat 10.6 on, I can run Dirt 2 w/ 8xAA, all settings maxed, at 1920x1200, and have Vsync enabled because the framerate is pegged at 60 FPS the entire time.

    AMD did something pretty fantastic with their drivers I think.
    PII 965BE @ 3.8Ghz /|\ TRUE 120 w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan /|\ XFX HD 5870 /|\ 4GB G.Skill 1600mhz DDR3 /|\ Gigabyte 790GPT-UD3H /|\ Two lovely 24" monitors (1920x1200) /|\ and a nice leather chair.

Page 2 of 18 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •