You see we started this discussing about survival of the direct competitor of 560, also the 6950-1GB's. I was referring to that when i said, it's dead, nobody will buy it unless the drop the price.
This statement "6950 1GB is slightly faster than 560 1GB while costing the same" is debatable, and there is different meanings about it. I personally (and several serious reviews too) mean 560 has the upper hand in performance/power-usage/OCing headroom.
Anyways, we can always argue and never agree, but that's OK, because the price/performance-ratio is the most important factor in mainstream generally, and specially in this round where these cards are pretty close to each other.
My statement was based on my own research, where I did a few days ago and ended up buying a 560. it's based on the prices at my local dealers. They are selling the 560 generally 10% cheaper then 6950 (which i have already provided links for), but if those German-pricing are current then these is another history, then either AMD has drooped the price, or something else. but anyways, it proves the point i was trying to make. Same point that I got flamed for. My main point was, and still is, they have to drop the price to survive, and they seams to have done it. Those German sites has proven my point was right!
I got flamed for saying they can't sell the 6950 for 10% more, they have to drop the price to become competitive and survive, and now your German-pricing are confirming the exact same point.
Do you think i can get a apology for all those baseless claims and all those aggressive flames? I don' think so, some will still try to be funny again, tomorrow too. LMAO.
Bookmarks