Results 1 to 25 of 593

Thread: GTX 560 Coming soon!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Vantage is completely irrelevant these days, though.
    Yeah, we have to see bench on real games to conclude, but that's a really impressive score anyways.

    That's the factory-OC, and it should have more headroom. In case, this will become a little OC-monster.
    It will be interesting to see this @1.1GHz with some voltage-tweaks.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    Yeah, we have to see bench on real games to conclude, but that's a really impressive score anyways.

    That's the factory-OC, and it should have more headroom. In case, this will become a little OC-monster.
    It will be interesting to see this @1.1GHz with some voltage-tweaks.
    That is very true but most SC card's ive previously owned havent overclocked much past the SC clocks.. Wonder if the standard 560's will clock higher then the SC revisions? Time will tell i guess..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    That is very true but most SC card's ive previously owned havent overclocked much past the SC clocks.. Wonder if the standard 560's will clock higher then the SC revisions? Time will tell i guess..
    I've never used a SC, but 1GHz is a really good OC already and standard 560 should do the same too, at least.
    This 560 can be pretty cool tho, and in case, you can push more voltages too. Then it can hopefully become a big OC-monster.
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 01-20-2011 at 04:00 AM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montana, USA
    Posts
    503
    The physical layout of the memory chips seems odd... Are all Fermis like this? It would make more sense to me to have 2 banks of 4 chips on the top and right side. Just from a timing and trace route standpoint. Maybe that rouge chip acts more like a L3 cache rather than being attached to the main mem buffer?
    Last edited by LexDiamonds; 01-20-2011 at 07:19 AM.
    i7-2600K @ 4806Mhz 102.3x47 1.368v LinX stable
    MSI P67 GD-80
    16Gb Corsair 8-8-8-24 1T 818.2Mhz
    MSI GTX560Ti 1005/2250 1.062v
    Crucial m4 256Gb SSD
    Corsair TX850 | 64bit WIN7 Pro
    Custom watercooling
    47" 1080p LCD | Onkyo 876/ Polk 5.1 surround

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by LexDiamonds View Post
    The physical layout of the memory chips seems odd... Are all Fermis like this? It would make more sense to me to have 2 banks of 4 chips on the top and right side. Just from a timing and trace route standpoint. Maybe that rouge chip acts more like a L3 cache rather than being attached to the main mem buffer?
    GDDR5 standard allows for much more relaxed PCB trace wiring, than previous on-board memory types.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Yep Lab501 use a I7 980@4ghz, they was using PhysX on the run for get this score with the 560, untill they use too a 4ghz I7 980 ...
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •