Results 1 to 25 of 256

Thread: Bulldoze that Sandy Bridge

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by RaV666 View Post
    Sorry JF, i of course meant shanghai/deneb.
    I learn something every day here .
    So one more question, when similar (almost identical) chips share some of the layers,but not all.They get different steppings ?
    Which would mean, that IF cpus have the same stepping/revision/node/family thats when theyre identical for sure ?
    That seems to be the case.Which means many (not all) opterons share the same dies with many (not all) desktop cpus.
    And that would mean that its not that desktop cpus (with same die) dont have the extra HT links, but that theyre inactive and same goes for any other functionality differences.
    Of course athlons and other segment dedicated cpus dont have to follow that rule.
    Now it gets into the area that I prefer not to discuss because the conversation could hit the edges of areas I am not allowed to talk about.
    While I work for AMD, my posts are my own opinions.

    http://blogs.amd.com/work/author/jfruehe/

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    195

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Now it gets into the area that I prefer not to discuss because the conversation could hit the edges of areas I am not allowed to talk about.
    Thanks for your sincerity, i appreciate that.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Now it gets into the area that I prefer not to discuss because the conversation could hit the edges of areas I am not allowed to talk about.
    This explain why I sometimes don't get concreted answers from you about these topics

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    173
    I don't understand AMD's logic at all, why not release AM3+ boards now, this will generate revenue for both AMD + mobo partners, and this will allow all the fence sitters waiting for BD to purchase a AM3+ board (and maybe even a CPU if they have a socket 7 / 939 rig) to tie them over until BD arrives...

    If you go by what the local wholesale distributor says, they don't expect shipments until May. That is a ton of potential sales AMD could be generating, but instead they are bulldozing those fence sitters to intel's playground.


  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    Quote Originally Posted by Kobaltrock View Post
    I don't understand AMD's logic at all, why not release AM3+ boards now, this will generate revenue for both AMD + mobo partners, and this will allow all the fence sitters waiting for BD to purchase a AM3+ board (and maybe even a CPU if they have a socket 7 / 939 rig) to tie them over until BD arrives...

    If you go by what the local wholesale distributor says, they don't expect shipments until May. That is a ton of potential sales AMD could be generating, but instead they are bulldozing those fence sitters to intel's playground.

    traditionally, AMD is not a weak chip maker but really not good in marketing and sales I believe.

  6. #6
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Kobaltrock View Post
    I don't understand AMD's logic at all, why not release AM3+ boards now, this will generate revenue for both AMD + mobo partners, and this will allow all the fence sitters waiting for BD to purchase a AM3+ board (and maybe even a CPU if they have a socket 7 / 939 rig) to tie them over until BD arrives...

    If you go by what the local wholesale distributor says, they don't expect shipments until May. That is a ton of potential sales AMD could be generating, but instead they are bulldozing those fence sitters to intel's playground.

    Maybe they are trying to get rid of old stock of boards.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Maybe they are trying to get rid of old stock of boards.

    Not what customers want to hear when they've just dropped £150+ on a Crosshair IV!!!! grrrrrrr

    Out of principle I will be refusing to buy AM3+ no matter how good bulldozer is - waiting for AM4 or intel equivelant (if bulldozer doesnt live up to the hype).
    4960X@4.7 | Asus RIVF | 16Gb@2400 | 256Gb 840 Pro | R9 290 | AX-860W | 540Air | Custom W/C

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by zoomee View Post
    Not what customers want to hear when they've just dropped £150+ on a Crosshair IV!!!! grrrrrrr

    Out of principle I will be refusing to buy AM3+ no matter how good bulldozer is - waiting for AM4 or intel equivelant (if bulldozer doesnt live up to the hype).
    The socket will most likely be called FM4 as the AM name is being dumped by AMD. That socket better be bigger than 942 pins or it's not sale!
    They (AMD) better make sure that BD has better memory bandwidth than the Phenom CPU, otherwise people will end up moving to Intel. So AMD get your act together or prepare to lose sales.
    The memory bandwidth sucks as it is.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Maybe they are trying to get rid of old stock of boards.
    I somehow doubt this, they would have stopped producing boards way before '11 swung around.

    It could be a chipset issue of some kind though. End of May is a very long way away...

    Quote Originally Posted by scorpidragon View Post
    The socket will most likely be called FM4 as the AM name is being dumped by AMD. That socket better be bigger than 942 pins or it's not sale!
    They (AMD) better make sure that BD has better memory bandwidth than the Phenom CPU, otherwise people will end up moving to Intel. So AMD get your act together or prepare to lose sales.
    The memory bandwidth sucks as it is.
    I am also wondering if AMD will have IOMMU on all chipsets, instead of only the fx series (990fx?). That, with increased memory bandwidth would be a killer.

    Intel screwed up by not allowing VT-d on their 'k' series of CPUs, so I hope AMD enables this for all their line.
    Last edited by Kobaltrock; 01-18-2011 at 06:31 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •