MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 537

Thread: Sandy Bridge i7 & i5 Reviews

Threaded View

  1. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    No amdzone is just a link where one poster summed the actual results(and you know this,you are just using amdzone as an excuse when you are confronted with actual data). You can search for i7 results,they are pretty consistent as long as 64 bit version of linux is used(no matter what distribution).Also the test suite version has to be the same or similar subversion(as 2.00 vs 2.00.b2).Same goes for AMD X4/X6.

    Example
    (phoronix test suite 2.0.0) :
    http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...807-9811-25231
    2 i7s @ 2.67Ghz compared on 2 diff. gnome kernels(x64),GCC 4.4.1 - result :199

    (phoronix test suite 2.0.0b2)
    http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...45-12535-29612
    1 i7 @ 2.67 on ubuntu 9.04 (x64),GCC 4.3.3 - result : 191.8

    Pretty consistent result for i7 at the same clock,the difference is ~3% even though the OS,compiler and the test suite version are not the same(test suit version is the closest match i could get).
    If you compile openssl with AES-NI enable, it can yield up to 12x the performance improvment...

    http://software.intel.com/en-us/arti...ith-intel-ipp/

    So if you want to run openssl and intel just compile it right... the same way goes for amd...

    Thats the fun part about open source software.. but they arn't exactly benchmark friendly since you can customize them so much and nothing is standardized.
    Last edited by Hornet331; 12-25-2010 at 05:53 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •