X6 1090T (1010MPMW) @ 4267MHz 1.44V NB@3229MHz 1.33V | Asus Crosshair IV Formula | 2x2GB Corsair Dominator GTX2 @ 1845MHz 6-6-5-17-22 1T | Asus HD4890 @ 1050/4800 | Corsair HX850W | HAF 932
EK Supreme HF | EK-FC4890LT | MCP655 + Koolance D5 Top | ThermoChill PA120.3 + 3x Enermax Magma | XSPC Bay res | Masterkleer 1/2" UV Red
Thanks...figured out a way to get things under control. The Asus turbo V software really helped.
I run 1x360 BIX and 1x120 XSPC all on Sythe GT 1850's. But it obviously is still not enough to hold 1.5v plus. The below run topped out at around 52 degrees on the core. Whats the safe temp for AMD these days?? My ambients are around 23-25 degrees.
Here's where I am . 3 hours prime 4.06 ghz. Set to 1.385v in bios. With load line went to 1.41v in CPUZ. CPU NB at 2.7 and ram at 1800 CL8
Next up 4.2 Ghz.
Without load line, the board tends to under volt a lot and that kills stability.
Oh, I see. In the future make sure to mention that it's a new entry / chip as otherwise I have no way to know. The only reason I asked in this particular case is because the clocks were lower.I'll hold off until you're ready if you still need some time with it first.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Looking good!Noctua NH-D14 cooling, 25c ambients, censor on different room so here might be even warmer cause cpu warms a LOT!
1.475 for CPU from bios.. actual stress-voltage on cpu-z.
And here is the final result. Ambient temp started falling after i just opened my rooms door, so the air could chance!No cold air or anything.
![]()
Last edited by Asmola; 12-02-2010 at 11:06 AM.
3930K
very nice Asmola!
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
looking goodif you click the link in my sig it shows voltages i needed for clocks ranging from 3.2ghz to 4.3ghz (which will obviously be different than yours) but more importantly it shows my temps at said voltages which might give you some insight. my water is also listed in my sig, both rads using 100+ cfm fans for those tests though
LEO!!!! amd phenom II x6 1100T | gigabyte 990fxa-ud3 . . 2x2gb g.skill 2133c8 | 128gb g.skill falcon ssd sapphire ati 5850 | x-fi xtrememusic. . . samsung f4 2tb | samsung dvdrw . . corsair tx850w | windows 7 64-bit. ddc3.25 xspc restop | ek ltx | mc-tdx | BIP . . lycosa-g9-z2300 | 26" 1920x1200 lcd .
To a system with less cpu-nb voltage is not constant.
voltage is much that I use; will destroy the IMC ?
1055t
FSB/Multiplier:13
CPU Speed:4004
NB Speed:3080
CPU Voltage:1.475
CPU-NB Voltage:1.45
nb voltage:auto (1.1)
RAM Speed:1643
Motherboard:c4f
Model: 125w
____________
Obsidian 800D/CPU:AMD Phenom II X6 1090T/Mobo:Asus Crosshair IV Formula/RAM-GeIL Evo One ddr3 4GB 2133MHz CL9/VGA:HD 6950 CF /HDD:2x80GB Intel SSD Postville Raid0/PSU PC Power & Cooling Silencer Quad Cf S75CF-EU(750W)/Monitor:2xLG flatron w2361v & Dell u2311h/Custom W/c:Koolance CPU-360 Rev1.1/Swiftech MCP655/EK Water Blocks EK-FB ASUS Crosshair 4-Acetal + Nickel/BlackIce GTX 120/Magicool Xtreme III 360
Hello, a question:
Right now I test my new 1090T, it is currently stable at 4GHz with 1.44 v, and wanted to know, how much is the maximum voltage recommended for use 24 / 7.
I've been looking for, and some say it is 1.50 v, one that is 155V, but I clarified.
Greetings and Merry Christmas to all!
Update, CPU now are stable (1H Prime95)
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: ccbbe cb 1022cpmw
CPU Frequency: 4179 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.44V
CPU Multiplier: 17x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2458 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 245 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-2133
RAM Timings: 9-11-9-28-1T
RAM Configuration: 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) G.Skill F3-17000CL9D-8GBXLD
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair Formula IV
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890FX + SB850
Cooling: Prolimatech Armageddon Push->Pull 120mm
Temps: 31C Idle / 56C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
![]()
![]()
Last edited by Champagne; 12-07-2011 at 03:55 AM.
Motherboard: MAXIMUS IV EXTREME rev. B3
CPU: INTEL i7-2700k @ 5400Mhz
Watercooling: Swiftech H20-320 push-pull 6x120 mm
Memory: G.Skill F3-17000CL9D-8GBXLD 2133MHz 9 11 9 28 2N
Graphic Card: Crossfire ASUS HD 7970 3Go @ 1200/1800 / VTX 7950 3Go @ ont sais pas
Sound card: Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion Series
Power supply: Corsair AX-850
SSD: OCZ Vertex 3 120Go (o.s)
HDD: WD 600Go Velociraptor (games)
HDD: WD 500Go caviar black (stock)
HDD: WD 200Go caviar black (save)
Case: ATC'S 840 porte pléxi
Rhéobus : Lamptron FC5
Cooling : 1x230mm 1x140mm 3x120mm
Keyboard: Logitech G510
Mouse: Saitek Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Screen: HANNS-G 28" x 3 eyefinity
Headset: TTeSports SHOCK ONE 5.1 Gaming, Plantronics Gamecom 777
O.S: Windows Se7en 64 Bit
NB multiplier is locked only +upwards. U can chage it down (clocked this CPU with busspeed)
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Hi guys.
Currently I have a Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5 with a 1090T @ 3.8GHz, NB@3000 and HT@2000MHz, the voltage are: 1.325V for CPU, 1.150 for NB and 1.375 for CPU/NB. Some people has tell me that run the CPU/NB with a voltage above of CPU voltage is dangerous, Is that true?.
SAINT19
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.". Albert Einstein.
Max overclock archived, 1090T @ 6.5GHz
Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.8GHz and NB @ 3000MHz both with 1.325V on BIOS
Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5 Rev. 2.0 with F4 BIOS
Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 1600 8-8-8-21-1T
MSI GTX 680 Lightning 2GB
Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD + Hitachi 2x500GB HDD
EK Supreme HF Full Nickel + MCP655-D5 + MCR320-QP
.
Opteron 180 @ 2.8 GHz || A8N32-SLI || 2x 1Gb Corsair 3500LL Pro || 7900 GTX || Tt 680W PurePower
MCP655 > Storm > MCW60 > 3/4" T-line > MCP655 > Storm (Opty 165) > 2-302 HC w/2x 140CFM Deltas
Latest Toy: 940BE || M3A32-MVP || Corsair TwinX2048-6400C4D || OCZ Stealth 600W
This 1100T seems to like overclocking better than my 1090T did. Don't read too much into NB or memory clocks as they're relaxed for CPU clock testing. I was stable at 3GHz NB for instance at 3.8 GHz, but 4.0 GHz was a wash at any voltage. Relaxed NB and 4GHz was doable at stock turbo voltage (1.45V)--maybe even less (I didn't check).
![]()
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Charts are up to date.
---
It looks like I'm first to the punch with an 1100T--what gives?![]()
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: ............
CPU Frequency: 4200 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.48V idle 1.504v load
CPU Multiplier: 21
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 3000 MHz
HT ref Speed: 200
RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
RAM Timings: 8-9-8-24-1T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790XTA UD4
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 790X / SB750
Cooling: Ek Supreme HF
Temps: +/-18C Idle / 33C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: so far, has 2h prime95 in blend
Voltages:
CPU: 1,48v-1,50v load
NB:1,16v
CPU/NB:1.37v
CPU PLL: 2.54v
HT:1,24v
RAM:1,65v
SB/PCIe/PLL:1,80v
As you can see these voltages, for use 24/7?
Last edited by >D4L70N<; 01-02-2011 at 09:00 AM.
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1075T
CPU Stepping: /
CPU Frequency: 4515 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.56V
CPU Multiplier: 15x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 3010 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 301 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
RAM Timings: 6-6-6-18-1T
RAM Configuration: 4 GB (2 x 2 GB)
RAM vDIMM: 1.88V
Motherboard: ASUS M4A89GTD PRO/USB3
Chipset/Socket: AM3, 890GX + SB850
Cooling: H2O (EK wave)
Temps: /
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested
![]()
Updated.
Last edited by Particle; 01-02-2011 at 01:14 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Running up against some sort of hard wall. I can do 4030 at 1.45V and pass 10+ hours of OCCT, but 4100 is a bust at any voltage, NB clock, or memory clock within seconds to minutes.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Mid-50s? Nah, that's pretty comfortable. We're talking about +70 MHz here.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Last edited by QuietIce; 01-03-2011 at 06:50 PM.
.
Opteron 180 @ 2.8 GHz || A8N32-SLI || 2x 1Gb Corsair 3500LL Pro || 7900 GTX || Tt 680W PurePower
MCP655 > Storm > MCW60 > 3/4" T-line > MCP655 > Storm (Opty 165) > 2-302 HC w/2x 140CFM Deltas
Latest Toy: 940BE || M3A32-MVP || Corsair TwinX2048-6400C4D || OCZ Stealth 600W
Frick'n heck. I'm already using a Tuniq Tower 120 Extreme with two Scythe S-FLEX G fans.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Do you have 80+ CFM of exhaust fan(s) on the case to go with that?
.
Opteron 180 @ 2.8 GHz || A8N32-SLI || 2x 1Gb Corsair 3500LL Pro || 7900 GTX || Tt 680W PurePower
MCP655 > Storm > MCW60 > 3/4" T-line > MCP655 > Storm (Opty 165) > 2-302 HC w/2x 140CFM Deltas
Latest Toy: 940BE || M3A32-MVP || Corsair TwinX2048-6400C4D || OCZ Stealth 600W
Bookmarks