23' 120hz IPS monitor

[XSAlliN]

It's not really a bonus because I was at 100Hz and 85Hz in 1600x1200 with my old screen. The bonus is more on the resolution where I don't have to rely on a second screen.

I used to move for many LAN (CS,Q3 UT, War3). I still play these games but less often and you can add TF2 and some others shooters. For SC2 and others games or just normal use, the color aren't that great like the view angle but I'm accustomed now and when I play it's not at 180° .
I can't imagine myself playing on a 60Hz screen. My eyes bleed even on the desk (scrooling and moving windows ). I need at last 85Hz. I think I will only change my TFT if there is something cheap and better.

As for the audio I use a ATH-A700 which is awesome
GO TO HELL RAZER WITH THEIR STUPID AND GEEK PRODUCTS !

You're wrong - you're judging LCD refresh rate as CRT refresh rate... setting CRT refresh rate at 60 Hz can affect your eyes that's true, but LCD it's an entirely different technology that only reflect in Frames per Second.

PS.Razer products are not for geeks... you'll see more gamers that didn't even finish high school because of gaming using those products, than you'll ever see geeks, which usually have higher standards - and being geek they get informed on what to buy... don't just settle with marketing "BS"... and another thing, geeks usually like rts's or rpg's, you'll rarely see one playing shooters like CS,Q3 UT - and the players of this shooters are the main target of Razer products. Beyond that, Razer products are "very good" for their purpose (shooters like CS,Q3 UT...) - the only problem with them is their quality... they look nice and used for office would last longer but gaming is kinda harsh on them and they need a string build.

for gaming 23 inch is too small.............. 27 or 30 is where is`s at.

For general gaming yes - for professional gaming even "19 non wide is better (preferably a CRT what which can be set to 800 x 600).