Page 18 of 149 FirstFirst ... 8151617181920212868118 ... LastLast
Results 426 to 450 of 3724

Thread: AMD Cayman info (or rumor)

  1. #426
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    580 discussion i believe is a couple threads below this one.

    this is a cayman/antilles rumors thread

    Yes, you heard it right, some AIBs have Cayman chips now, and if everything else holds true to form, they should be on the store shelves across the world in 2-4 weeks. The kits come with a Cayman and some 6Ghz GDDR5, so the memory clocks will end up between 5.5-6GHz.
    http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/11/...ips-turn-wild/

    so thats between 1375-1500mhz right? wow
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  2. #427
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    We need specs, how come if the launch of 69xx is so close ATI/AMD hasn't even released any speculation or information on the specs? They are doing a pretty good job at keeping everybody in the dark.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  3. #428
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
    We need specs, how come if the launch of 69xx is so close ATI/AMD hasn't even released any speculation or information on the specs? They are doing a pretty good job at keeping everybody in the dark.
    See: Barts, RV770, etc.

    They're really good at keeping things secret

  4. #429
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by stangracin3 View Post
    my prediction on the GTX 580 is late march early april
    My prediction:

    November: paper launched, reviewer edition
    December: very limited availability for christmas shopping spree appereance
    January: trickling yet still limited availability
    February: good availability

    Basically it will be ~2 months behind in good market availability compared to Cayman boards, December vs February.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
    We need specs, how come if the launch of 69xx is so close ATI/AMD hasn't even released any speculation or information on the specs? They are doing a pretty good job at keeping everybody in the dark.
    Their secrecy keeping deserves an award i guess, simply mind boggling.

  5. #430
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by spursindonesia View Post
    Their secrecy keeping deserves an award i guess, simply mind boggling.
    From my understanding, they finally tracked down a number of their leaks.

  6. #431

  7. #432
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    See: Barts, RV770, etc.

    They're really good at keeping things secret
    Exactly:

    2 Days before HD4000 official unveil
    Rumour: 480SP (doomed card, nvidia will masacrate "Ati")

    Official unveil
    800SP
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  8. #433
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by necronomicon View Post
    Can't really understand what page 2 is saying, but it seems like the change to 4D is confirmed

    Bad translation also:
    "From a risk management point of view , the new framework for the development of the face of GPU core when the size and schedule are very dangerous. If the core size is too large, then it may affect future plans. So the new structure is more in the high-end GPU for fever. "
    Basically, Cayman is a new architecture compared to Barts which is mostly similar to Cypress...

    This is getting interesting
    Last edited by zerazax; 11-02-2010 at 09:49 PM.

  9. #434
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Can't really understand what page 2 is saying, but it seems like the change to 4D is confirmed

    Bad translation also:


    Basically, Cayman is a new architecture compared to Barts which is mostly similar to Cypress...

    This is getting interesting
    also... wow at document, phenomenal presentation, also we can see how their long term marketing strategy plan is falling into place with the technology being implemented, where there wont be any medium to low end GPU's only performance level up, the rest, will be fusion.

    Reason for this is that they are either very confident on pre-agreed contracts for OEM manufacturers to build fusion systems (including discrete graphics within the APU, or they're just plain nuts which I don't think is the case to be at all.

    The insight and strategic planning from the red team seems to be highly cohesive, and much more comprehensive that the green team's.

    The advantages for the red team is that they also run a cpu business, and can allow for dual/combined strategies within different market segments.

    This might hopefully make both companies to concentrate on being more competitive (price wise) in the top end graphics segment, and therefore drive prices somewhat lower...

    Another eventuality which I do not believe will take place is for Nvidia to lose interest on the high end market, and only focus on commercial and low end graphics...

  10. #435
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    also... wow at document, phenomenal presentation, also we can see how their long term marketing strategy plan is falling into place with the technology being implemented, where there wont be any medium to low end GPU's only performance level up, the rest, will be fusion.

    Reason for this is that they are either very confident on pre-agreed contracts for OEM manufacturers to build fusion systems (including discrete graphics within the APU, or they're just plain nuts which I don't think is the case to be at all.

    The insight and strategic planning from the red team seems to be highly cohesive, and much more comprehensive that the green team's.

    The advantages for the red team is that they also run a cpu business, and can allow for dual/combined strategies within different market segments.

    This might hopefully make both companies to concentrate on being more competitive (price wise) in the top end graphics segment, and therefore drive prices somewhat lower...

    Another eventuality which I do not believe will take place is for Nvidia to lose interest on the high end market, and only focus on commercial and low end graphics...
    Are you saying AMD is trying to bully Nvidia out of the high end market?
    Last edited by tajoh111; 11-02-2010 at 10:40 PM.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  11. #436
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Are you AMD is trying to bully Nvidia out of the high end market?
    nVidia might just do all the work for AMD if they keep doing what they're doing

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  12. #437
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    nVidia might just do all the work for AMD if they keep doing what they're doing
    I think its way too early to say that, but the original fermi was a bad start for them. So far, NV release style has been too defensive(they respond to something), rather than offensive(they make a product to respond to what AMD has released). The offense they have put up is the gtx 460 and AMD answered pretty well even though it took a bit of time. NV just putting no pressure on AMD at all.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  13. #438
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I think its way too early to say that, but the original fermi was a bad start for them. So far, NV release style has been too defensive(they respond to something), rather than offensive(they make a product to respond to what AMD has released). The offense they have put up is the gtx 460 and AMD answered pretty well even though it took a bit of time. NV just putting no pressure on AMD at all.
    It is exactly that, pro-active marketing strategy vs reactive marketing strategy. One dictates and the other counters (also a timing issue).

    Since the gtx200 series, Nvidia hasn't been leading the market, which is fair as you can't expect the one company to lead the market forever.

    However a defensive marketing strategy is build around trumping your opponent's moves regardless of the cost ( cost to produce GTX460 die size vs yields). Nvidia did this to retain market share, and they did a fantastic job taking into account the time constraints to respond after the GTX480 flop. However when you look at the timing factor, there is a six month CIRCA gap between AMD's dev team and Nvidia's, I simply do not think that Nvidia had sufficent time to react yet.

    28nm will be different altogether, since both parties were told about 32nm cancellation at the same time, so in theory they also started to plan and develop 28nm architecture roughly at the same time. Like I said before, its mostly a timing issue.

  14. #439
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I think its way too early to say that, but the original fermi was a bad start for them. So far, NV release style has been too defensive(they respond to something), rather than offensive(they make a product to respond to what AMD has released). The offense they have put up is the gtx 460 and AMD answered pretty well even though it took a bit of time. NV just putting no pressure on AMD at all.
    That's kind of a non-sensical statement.. of course one is seen as "more defensive" when it comes after the other one. If you're around a year late for some of your products chances are you are going to be seen as releasing "defensively", given that you know exactly what you're up against because it's in the market already.

  15. #440
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Are you saying AMD is trying to bully Nvidia out of the high end market?
    A firm's objective is mostly always the same , MARKET SHARE.

    It's simply the natural order of markets which dictates that companies will try (if within reach) to obtain as high market share if feasibly possible.

    I would never say bully, but the high end market even if not most profitable, still brings very good PR for company (e.g. fastest card in the world) (e.g. unparalleled computing power) some of those claims, even if tacky, will still be a phenomenal form of marketing, thus getting more contracts on some of their lower end products (OEM's)

  16. #441
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by spursindonesia View Post
    My prediction:

    November: paper launched, reviewer edition
    December: very limited availability for christmas shopping spree appereance
    January: trickling yet still limited availability
    February: good availability

    Basically it will be ~2 months behind in good market availability compared to Cayman boards, December vs February.



    Their secrecy keeping deserves an award i guess, simply mind boggling.
    did you check availability of Barts? no paperlaunch and available they will do the same for cayman in a few weeks.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

  17. #442
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    also... wow at document, phenomenal presentation, also we can see how their long term marketing strategy plan is falling into place with the technology being implemented, where there wont be any medium to low end GPU's only performance level up, the rest, will be fusion.

    Reason for this is that they are either very confident on pre-agreed contracts for OEM manufacturers to build fusion systems (including discrete graphics within the APU, or they're just plain nuts which I don't think is the case to be at all.

    The insight and strategic planning from the red team seems to be highly cohesive, and much more comprehensive that the green team's.

    The advantages for the red team is that they also run a cpu business, and can allow for dual/combined strategies within different market segments.

    This might hopefully make both companies to concentrate on being more competitive (price wise) in the top end graphics segment, and therefore drive prices somewhat lower...

    Another eventuality which I do not believe will take place is for Nvidia to lose interest on the high end market, and only focus on commercial and low end graphics...
    But you just know that some dude with Llano "just gotta have me geforce" is gonna go out and buy a discrete gs430 anyhow...
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  18. #443
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by duploxxx View Post
    did you check availability of Barts? no paperlaunch and available they will do the same for cayman in a few weeks.
    Hey, i've got to check back my optimism regarding AMD so nobody will hot stamp my forehead with a certain scarlett letter of fanboy stigma here, haven't i ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    But you just know that some dude with Llano "just gotta have me geforce" is gonna go out and buy a discrete gs430 anyhow...
    Hmm, thinking about that, it means anybody buying APU such as Llano, it will be packaged like a VGA card or CPU ? I think it would be like a CPU package, since the chip itself will take form like a CPU, but it should come with a CD driver, right ? and perhaps a copy of certain promotional game ?

  19. #444
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    But you just know that some dude with Llano "just gotta have me geforce" is gonna go out and buy a discrete gs430 anyhow...
    well, people that buy GPU's usually have a general understanding of "how much they go/how much more they want"

    gs430 is so discreet I would not doubt that 4 core fusion cpu will be better, not many people will buy discreet just because they want green team, OEM's don;t quite work like that, and low end discreet is aimed just at that segment, OEM

  20. #445
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    so we'll have to wait 3/4 weeks ?
    and if 6970 is as good as it seems, NV will authorize benchers to leak performance tests cause they're late...if they compete well, or leak and adjust their pricing if they don't.
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  21. #446
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by spursindonesia View Post
    Hmm, thinking about that, it means anybody buying APU such as Llano, it will be packaged like a VGA card or CPU ? I think it would be like a CPU package, since the chip itself will take form like a CPU, but it should come with a CD driver, right ? and perhaps a copy of certain promotional game ?
    cpu package with drivers for sure though I think they will advertise the gpu class present on die such as 5570 or something like that.
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  22. #447
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    well, people that buy GPU's usually have a general understanding of "how much they go/how much more they want"
    I disagree, people are completely clueless in general. They buy off half remembered recommendations from friends who don't know anything either.

  23. #448
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by spursindonesia View Post
    My prediction:

    November: paper launched, reviewer edition
    December: very limited availability for christmas shopping spree appereance
    January: trickling yet still limited availability
    February: good availability

    Basically it will be ~2 months behind in good market availability compared to Cayman boards, December vs February.



    Their secrecy keeping deserves an award i guess, simply mind boggling.
    I still doubt they will have them in reviewers hands until very late november if that is the case. more than likely it will be december.

    for good availability i still stand by my earlier statment of late march

  24. #449
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    From my understanding, they finally tracked down a number of their leaks.
    Was it you that suggested that they were spreading out different information before the 5xxx series release in order to track down their leaks? Sounds about right

  25. #450
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMojoZ View Post
    I disagree, people are completely clueless in general. They buy off half remembered recommendations from friends who don't know anything either.
    im really tired of hearing the "this one has more migabites" argument from those who think they know something
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

Page 18 of 149 FirstFirst ... 8151617181920212868118 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •