do we know the bitrate of caymen xt, or just assuming it?
i would think that 256bit might be enough with some really fast memory (hopefully thats why they put the cheap crappy stuff in barts)
do we know the bitrate of caymen xt, or just assuming it?
i would think that 256bit might be enough with some really fast memory (hopefully thats why they put the cheap crappy stuff in barts)
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
Last edited by cold2010; 10-29-2010 at 07:50 AM.
oh snap 2gb standard popping up thats pretty cool. 32 rops though? can that be right? seems too little for cayman.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
2 GB VRAM, that's cool, fits right in with its status as enthusiast level card, AMD's back in highend single GPU arena.![]()
That's really sweet. Can't wait for it to come out!![]()
doesnt anyne else find this 32 rops number too low?
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
VLIW4
New architecture anyone?
Anyone has the original source (says there expreview on all 3 photos).
By the way, there is absolutely no indication of how big Cayman is on that photo, in case someone is claiming "THAT CHIP IS HUGE!!one".
Last edited by blindbox; 10-29-2010 at 08:56 AM.
Looks almost as big as a GF100. If AMD can keep up their perf/mm^2 this thing will surpass GTX 580 easily.
"No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."
Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
If this thing is indeed VLIW4 and has 1920SP,it's game over for any GF1xx chip,no matter if it has full 512 CUDA cores and high clock. With Cayman XT on the market,Cypress is going to be lowered in mid-high class and GTX480 as well.Antilles will be uber high end,in a class of its own,in line with Chuck Norris comments we already saw.
The box shape in the middle of the PCB isn't the chip itself, but the substrate/packaging size with its corresponding pin out. The chip itself would be rotated 45 degree in orientation, just like Cypress and Bart, and if you look further behind, R600. I still believe the chip won't be bigger than 400 mm^2, with TDP no higher than 230 w.
Yeah now that I look the pcb doesn't seem that much longer than a 6870.
Rop count seems a bit low, but who knows how it works with the VLIW4 architecture. 2 GB reference is nice though.
Last edited by Pantsu; 10-29-2010 at 10:28 AM.
"No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."
8 phase power on stock pcb. yum!
Primary Rig
Intel Xeon W3520 @4200Mhz 24x7, 1.200v load (3845A935)
Gigabyte X58A-UD7
Patriot Viper II DDR3 2000 CL8
Tagan BZ1300
DeepCool Gamer Storm with 2x120mm DeepCool fans.
MSI GTX 470 Twin Frozr II
Zotac GTX 470 AMP edition.
GPU collection : http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...5&postcount=64
Rig2
Phenom II x4 965
MSI 790GX-GD65
2GBx2 Corsair DDR3 1333
Tagan tg500-u37
Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro Rev.2
XFX 9600GT
Whooa, looks sweet!
So educate me on what VLIW4 is...
Do you remember all the 4D instead of 5D shader rumors for the HD68xx? If I'm not mistaken, it's that. Charlie wrote a bit on it here:
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/09/...thern-islands/
But, as we already know, it didn't turn out true for the HD68xx cards.
Last edited by ohnoitseddy; 10-29-2010 at 12:23 PM.
For people who dont know AMD used 5 way design's for most of the cards till now including the 68xx now VLIW4 is different in several ways.
The easiest way to tell the difference is that VLIW4 is suppose to use 4 medium sized units where as the old 5 way design used 1 big and 4 small units.
Coming Soon
Bookmarks