strange results tbh, dont know what to make of that, especially the QD ssd v hdd...maybe the writing was slowing down the reading with the SSD?
the fact that the max read and write are faster with the SSD makes perfect sense, and the fast IOP numbers all look in line with what i would suspect.
the QD though, is like the numbers are...dunno...unexplainable!
are the QD going higher on the ssd simply because it is reading faster, and can handle it better? i noticed the max reads are much faster for the processes with the ssd, and the fast iop count is faster, so common sense would say the QD would be lower...or is the system treating the SSD differently and requesting information faster....we know that the Win7 environment is optimized for SSD and that it handles them differently. but that much difference? wondering if the results would be the same with vista? headscratcher for sure. what about NCQ and ACHI, are they accessing information in a different manner from the SSD? when you think about it, faster read/write SHOULD equal lower QD!!
doesnt make any sense either, how can the drives have different amounts written/read from them in the total sections..the write iop count comparison is wrong, you have 40K writes compared to 11k writes, so that isnt the same...would throw the numbers off. the max data writes are way different too...even though you wrote the same amount of info for example:
photoshop test:
max data transferred HDD; 283,496,448
max data transferred SSD; 778,919,936
but you ran the same test on them? why would it write 2.7 times more data to the SSD for the same size file?
for the modern warfare 2 the results are much the same...tremendously more amount written to the SSD with the exact same usage?
seems like all of the write comparisons across the board follow this same pattern here. your read numbers for amount transferred look very close though. are you sure that you cleared the test before you ran them again on ssd?
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks