Quote Originally Posted by Lestat View Post
.../SNIP/...
i just dont think i could spend $600 plus for it given the 70-200 F/4L is only about $50 more... i think i would Def. take the L. but the 70-300 image stabilizer is nice. and it def. works very well.
Such a waste on my part, I could've gotten that lens, instead I've chosen the 75-300 III USM, w/o knowing their big difference!
Much worse, I had the money that time. Now I'm left w/ a lens that has a very soft IQ at 300mm.