Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 278

Thread: NVIDIA to Counter Radeon HD 6970 ''Cayman'' with GeForce GTX 580

  1. #151
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    You're .... sick of the GTX480?
    how long dose a card stay entertaining (not how long dose it stay good), it only takes like a week if that to max out a graphics card and if u want a new toy u want a new toy.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  2. #152
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    so amd is reducing cost and power, and nvidias reply to that is to offer a hotter, more expensive part?
    too bad, i had hoped gf110/gf102 would be more than 512sps at least...

  3. #153
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    310
    I hope nvidia gets the 512 cuda core 485 GTX or 580 or whatever its going to be named lined up for launch soon. Been happy with my 465 but I'm hitting video ram with my modded games and SLI won't help me. Would be a nice xmas upgrade for myself.

  4. #154
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    DID I JUST HEAR FULL GF104?????


    L]

  5. #155
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1000 Elysian Park Ave
    Posts
    2,669
    Man it seems like new video cards every month now
    i3-8100 | GTX 970
    Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
    Assume nothing; Question everything

  6. #156
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    512 bit 768 core @40 nm?

    nvidia going for a one chip per wafer strategy?


    On a serious note, though, if they can manage such a ship it's going to be pretty damn insane.
    I still think it is just a dual card, though...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  7. #157
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    nah the die size is going to be as pictured above.... larger than life...LITERALLY..

  8. #158
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    If you read the 4Gamer article, seems like GF119 is the next ION chip.

  9. #159
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post


    On a serious note, though, if they can manage such a ship it's going to be pretty damn insane.
    I still think it is just a dual card, though...
    or kepler in 28nm lol .... but yes 40nm is just impossible with this specs...
    Last edited by Lanek; 10-18-2010 at 09:15 AM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  10. #160
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    31
    Based on the discussions here I got myself a 5970 last fryday to replace my 2 x 260 gtx. was going to go for the 480 at first but hear too much negative.
    The card is fantastic. runs quite and stays cool. (moderate load)
    Buccaneer


    Corsair 800D, Asus P6T, I7 920 (corsair H50) Kingston 6 GB Ram, ASUS EAH5970 graphics, Raid 0,(2X1TB Caviar Black) LG BluRay Optical Drive. 2 X 1 TB Caviar Black for backup and file storage.

  11. #161
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by Neova View Post
    I hope nvidia gets the 512 cuda core 485 GTX or 580 or whatever its going to be named lined up for launch soon. Been happy with my 465 but I'm hitting video ram with my modded games and SLI won't help me. Would be a nice xmas upgrade for myself.

    it wont happen by christmas or whatever ....


    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    If you read the 4Gamer article, seems like GF119 is the next ION chip.

    really ??? with the same die space as a gt430 or so ???? id prefer it if they call it gt420 .... id buy it only for the name
    WILL CUDDLE FOR FOOD

    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  12. #162
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    227
    Whats the holdup on the full GF104 GTX 475 and the dual GF104 495?

  13. #163
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    I don't get why AMD has reduced the performance with HD68xx. They have given nVidia a real chance to take on now.

    nVidia doesn't need a GTX 580 now. All they need is a full 384 SP GF104, and a double-GPU with the same chip, with a competitive price. They should also drop the price of GTX 460. Then thay can make the life realy hard for AMD.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  14. #164
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    The low yields, simple as that.

    I think nvidia is still playing the "we need to maintin our marketshare" (they lost marketshare in reality)
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  15. #165
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    197
    WTF! Barts is midrange, Cayman is the product a GTX580 would have to contend with.

  16. #166
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Zeus View Post
    Whats the holdup on the full GF104 GTX 475 and the dual GF104 495?
    I wonder if they replaced the 475 with GF112 and the 495 with GF110.

  17. #167
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    I don't get why AMD has reduced the performance with HD68xx. They have given nVidia a real chance to take on now.

    nVidia doesn't need a GTX 580 now. All they need is a full 384 SP GF104, and a double-GPU with the same chip, with a competitive price. They should also drop the price of GTX 460. Then thay can make the life realy hard for AMD.
    You are thinking that 68xx is high end part?
    Barts(HD6800) is performance part that will replace 5800 series,having similar performance. Cayman is the high end part,featuring 1900+ SP (unknown exact number as of now) and this thing will destroy any GF100 based card out there,even the 512 CUDA cores parts if they ever launch. Then,there comes the dual Cayman card,the ultimate crusher,waiting to destroy any potential dual GF100 card ,if that thing ever sees a light of the day.

  18. #168
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    really ??? with the same die space as a gt430 or so ???? id prefer it if they call it gt420 .... id buy it only for the name
    Die space isn't the only factor, reducing the bus width also reduces the amount of ram chips needed per unit and at entry level saving say $.50 per unit is huge with volume.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  19. #169
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    You are thinking that 68xx is high end part?
    Barts(HD6800) is performance part that will replace 5800 series,having similar performance. Cayman is the high end part,featuring 1900+ SP (unknown exact number as of now) and this thing will destroy any GF100 based card out there,even the 512 CUDA cores parts if they ever launch. Then,there comes the dual Cayman card,the ultimate crusher,waiting to destroy any potential dual GF100 card ,if that thing ever sees a light of the day.
    Oh I see, they have messed up the naming schema?. I thought they had tow single-GPU and a double GPU, the same as last rounds. But it's good to hear they are releasing a high-end card too. It's good for competition and prices.

    When this Cayman is going to show up?

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  20. #170
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    and this thing will destroy any GF100 based card out there
    I'd wait and see for some official reviews there tiger before making that claim.

  21. #171
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Zeus View Post
    I'd wait and see for some official reviews there tiger before making that claim.
    Ha, yeaaahhhhhh.

  22. #172
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    DID I JUST HEAR FULL GF104?????


    L]
    OH MAN!
    Best so far and there's like 100 of these shoops.

    I like how this thread has so many replies yet any counterpart would logically be very far away from the 6 series launch. So much optimism.

  23. #173
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Zeus View Post
    I'd wait and see for some official reviews there tiger before making that claim.
    GTX480 is ~15% faster than 5870 today.Stream processor efficiency has been upped by quite a bit with NI generation(1120SP in BartsXT parts will almost be equal to 1600SP in Cypress-so lets say that "IPC" will go up by a decent 20%,not massive 42% as the SP count difference first shows).We will have ~1920SP with Cayman,each of which will be faster per clock than Evergreen class SP.Clock speeds are unknown for Cayman,but let's assume similar clock speed as 5870. On the conservative side,Cayman based 69xx will be ~45%(1.2 for the IPC x 1.2 for the SP count increase) faster than 5870.This alone is enough for it to crush any GF100 based single GPU card.
    Last edited by informal; 10-18-2010 at 11:16 AM.

  24. #174
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    45% faster than a 5870 is horribly close to 5970

    sounds like one beastly improvement on the same node. AMD/ATI really do know how to do magic things with their 45 and 40nm parts
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  25. #175
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    OH MAN!
    Best so far and there's like 100 of these shoops.

    I like how this thread has so many replies yet any counterpart would logically be very far away from the 6 series launch. So much optimism.
    Why would you have anything against such a optimism? We all should be happy if nVidia can do "something" to counter these GPUs, and push the prices down.

    Why don't you like to keep the optimism for a good competition? Do you like to pay extra high prices in this round too?

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •