Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 135

Thread: 6770 & 6750 Specs leaked

  1. #76
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    64
    Looks like some new cards are headed our way, but I have one major question? Where the hell are the fancy new DX11 games to take advantage of the added horsepower? What's the purpose of the new hardware, unless you game at really high resolutions?

    Looks like a bunch of let's change for the sake of progress. I know we need progress, but the industry needs some real change. In my opinion, better software > faster hardware.
    TANDY PC
    Intel 486 SX 25
    4 MB RAM
    Trident 512K SVGA
    120 MB Seagate HD
    14 Inch CTX CRT Monitor
    14.4K Modem (too slow for :banana::banana::banana::banana:)
    Radio Shack 2.0 Speakers (6V Battery Operated)
    OS: MS DOS 6.2
    Games: X-wing, Wing Commander, Veil of Darkness, Kings Quest, Zork

  2. #77
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by osiris999 View Post
    can i see a screen shot of your account balance? not doubting you in anyway and dont want to see anything that could hurt your identity but i just wanna see 7 figures.
    7 figures: 20,000.00

    I am sure he isn't lying


  3. #78
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    What? The new 4D system allows ~98.5 % of the performance at ~75 % diespace. So they can put 25 % more shaders to the same die area, meaning more theoretical number crunching capability per mm˛.

    What I suspect is that AMD isn't really going to just put 25 % more shaders to the core, instead focus on ROPs, TMUs and memory bandwidth because there are bigger bottlenecks there than in raw number crunching.
    i dont get how u would drop 25% of the shader room by dropping a small amount of cashe and a little smu, the master shader is the largest part then there is a small cashe for each scalier unit, so at most it should give u 20% of the die back by changing from 5 to 4 but its should be alot less than that (i would guess like 10%). the main advantage of it would be to make it more dynamic as u have to send all of the commands at once to the master and the scalier units so u should be able to get more efficiency by having more masters per scalier unit, but then overall u would have more die space per shader unit.

    on the rops, sure more would be nice, maybe there will be a higher end, but for memory we are not bandwidth limited ATM and clocking the ram dose not yield much gain if at all, and even underclocking ram u dont change performance much
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  4. #79
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    im wondering if they are pulling a marketing stunt, saying its faster, but ONLY in dx11 games

  5. #80
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMojoZ View Post
    when everyone else is comparing a 5770 to a 6770.
    Why? They aren't going to be the same price. I think that thats one thing that we can be sure of based on pricing in the last couple of generations.
    Last edited by BababooeyHTJ; 09-28-2010 at 04:04 PM.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    469
    Quote Originally Posted by omega1alpha View Post
    Looks like some new cards are headed our way, but I have one major question? Where the hell are the fancy new DX11 games to take advantage of the added horsepower? What's the purpose of the new hardware, unless you game at really high resolutions?

    Looks like a bunch of let's change for the sake of progress. I know we need progress, but the industry needs some real change. In my opinion, better software > faster hardware.
    you can thank microsoft and sony (mostly microsoft) with their current dx9 generation hardware in their consoles for that. most game companies write the game for the console and port it over to the computer and since the consoles are running on dx9 hardware they are not going to waste their time coding for dx9 and dx11. its sad really, microsoft recently just commented that they are going to start paying attention to their pc segment again whatever that means. hey microsoft, wanna help the pc which you seem to care about again? release a new console with dx11 hardware and not $150 attachment to make the current xbox a glorified wii!!! sorry, i had to rant

  7. #82
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by omega1alpha View Post
    Where the hell are the fancy new DX11 games to take advantage of the added horsepower?
    pc games dont make enough money for big companies to make fancy dx11 games.

    so what video card companies have done to keep business growing is encourage features like 3d and multiple displays. both technologies require a jump in graphics hardware just like a fancy dx11 game. 3d cuts fps in 1/2, 3 screens cuts it in 1/3. so we demand new and faster video cards to make these new features work better even though we didnt even want them few years ago

  8. #83
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    but this doesnt make sense...
    if rv940 is 6800 then what is cayman?
    if rv940 is 6800 then what is 6700?
    if rv940 is slightly slower than rv870 how is it going to replace it?

    nvidia will launch a faster part, ati will launch a slightly slower part?
    that doesnt make any sense... where does this rv940 aka bart = 6800 rumor come from anyways?

  9. #84
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    pc games dont make enough money for big companies to make fancy dx11 games.

    so what video card companies have done to keep business growing is encourage features like 3d and multiple displays. both technologies require a jump in graphics hardware just like a fancy dx11 game. 3d cuts fps in 1/2, 3 screens cuts it in 1/3. so we demand new and faster video cards to make these new features work better even though we didnt even want them few years ago
    its not like good games like bc2 sold almost as many vip keys as the consoles combined, and with no $10-15 royalties. the problem with pc sales is that they only count retail but thats less than half the pc market.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    but this doesnt make sense...
    if rv940 is 6800 then what is cayman?
    if rv940 is 6800 then what is 6700?
    if rv940 is slightly slower than rv870 how is it going to replace it?

    nvidia will launch a faster part, ati will launch a slightly slower part?
    that doesnt make any sense... where does this rv940 aka bart = 6800 rumor come from anyways?
    Well, AMD will be launching Caymen as well which should be faster than Cypress. Add to that Antilles which will be a dual caymen and you have the answer to Nvidia's possibly faster cards.

  11. #86
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,250
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    pc games dont make enough money for big companies to make fancy dx11 games.

    so what video card companies have done to keep business growing is encourage features like 3d and multiple displays. both technologies require a jump in graphics hardware just like a fancy dx11 game. 3d cuts fps in 1/2, 3 screens cuts it in 1/3. so we demand new and faster video cards to make these new features work better even though we didnt even want them few years ago
    a game that last a few hours cost as it does, some can understand why pc games often suck.

    good games sell.
    4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)

  12. #87
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by flopper View Post
    good games sell.
    Correction, games that have been marketed do sell as much as the marketing is or was hyped. Reason some companies spent more marketing than creating it.

    There are many amazing games that people have never heard about which were a sale failure due to a weak promotion.

    Bottom line: The marketing BS nowadays wins up most customers and that is a fact.

    This is a huge subject that I do not want to discuss any further.

  13. #88
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    hmmmm why is the 6770 running the mem at only 1050?
    Its got a 256-bit memory interface, so ends up faster even with only 1050.

  14. #89
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by marten_larsson View Post
    Well, AMD will be launching Caymen as well which should be faster than Cypress. Add to that Antilles which will be a dual caymen and you have the answer to Nvidia's possibly faster cards.
    yeah but if rv940 is 6800, then rv970 is what, 6900? and then dual rv970 is... what?

    Quote Originally Posted by EvilOne View Post
    Its got a 256-bit memory interface, so ends up faster even with only 1050.
    faster than rv840, but not as fast as rv870...

    either memory chips that clock slightly lower are cheaper, or they are doing it on purpose... maybe it would be too close to rv970 otherwise... or maybe they are reserving some space for a refresh in case 28nm has problems like 40nm?

  15. #90
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    533
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    yeah but if rv940 is 6800, then rv970 is what, 6900? and then dual rv970 is... what?
    6950, 6970 and the dual part 6990?

  16. #91
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Vardant View Post
    6950, 6970 and the dual part 6990?
    they might go crazy and do
    6930 = cayman pro
    6950= cayman xt
    6970= antilles pro
    6990= antilles xt
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  17. #92
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by Vardant View Post
    6950, 6970 and the dual part 6990?
    From that point of view it is reasonable that all cards made from one chiptype are in same number base.

    eg. 68x0 Barts, 69x0 Cayman etc.

  18. #93
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    533
    It still doesn't make sense from the consumer PoV though. We'll have to wait a couple days more I guess, there are leaks everyday now, so the speculation time might be over soon.

  19. #94
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    394
    Is NDA for these cards still the same ?

  20. #95
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    409
    Who knows, NDA ends when release date arrives. I think 12th-14th was suggested as a press event under NDA, and then give it week or two for reviews so by the end of the month is most likely.

    Nice mess of rumors going around. I still stick to my 40% performance improvement estimate, regardless of any naming shennanigans.
    "No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."

  21. #96
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ View Post
    Why? They aren't going to be the same price. I think that thats one thing that we can be sure of based on pricing in the last couple of generations.
    Way out of context there fella, he was asking about the chart we started out looking at. Pricing wasn't part of the equation.

  22. #97
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    I have 7 figures in my bank and they're not my account number.
    7 figures in your bank? really?


    x
    7
    =
    7 figures in your bank

    back on topic :
    Looking at the numbers the 6770 should beat my 5850 using less power...wonder what the temperatures will be like.
    System 1 (mine):
    CPU: i7 920 D0 stable at 4.0 GHz cooled by Scythe Mugen 2000
    GPU: PowerColor HD5850 (950/1250 1.2V)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 Memory: 6GB DDR3 GeiL @ 1528 MHz
    System 2 (gf's):
    CPU: i7 920 D0 currently at 4.2 GHz cooled by Noctua NH-D14 (needs more tweaking/testing)
    GPU: Club3D HD5850 (awaiting OC)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R Memory: 6GB DDR3 Corsair @ 1600 MHz

  23. #98
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Bel Air, Maryland
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by damha View Post
    7 figures: 20,000.00

    I am sure he isn't lying

    Hey, I don't know about you, but I think a spare 20k would be nice either way. Of course, I am a working college student with only 2k to my name. So maybe my view is different than yours.
    Either way, these cards are pretty exciting to me for the sole fact that this will give friends a good priced path for tons of gpu power.
    Intel i7-2700k@ 4.7ghz (46x102)
    Asus P8Z68 Deluxe GEN3
    G.Skill 2x4gb RipjawX 2133 11-11-11-30
    GTX 680 1220/7000
    Corsair TX750W
    Razer Lachesis w/ Razer Pro|Pad
    1x160gb Seagate HDD, 2x1tb Seagate HDD
    LG 22" 226WTQ & BenQ G2400WD
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1

  24. #99
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    583
    Lol I got 7 figures too if you count the pennies (ie. xx,000.00).

  25. #100
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by damha View Post
    7 figures: 20,000.00

    I am sure he isn't lying

    close actually

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •