Quote Originally Posted by Mechanical Man View Post
Lets take this example of yours and put it in different light. If Bobcat delivers performance expected by BOINC stats( +90% vs atom according to some). Then this 1.0GHz Bobcat will mach 1,9GHz atom in cpu power + has massively better gpu..
You're putting all the eggs in the BOINC basket. I do not think they are relevant to infer Bobcat's advantage over Atom across the line.
From the TDP it is likely Atom will have 1.6-2x frequency advantage at the same TDP. OoO brings you advantages, but not that much.

As for GPU being "massively better", if the hype/reality follows the same pattern as the CPU, it's clear.

Quote Originally Posted by mAJORD View Post
How is it still way to high?

All the competing Atom SoCs have virtually the same TDP, with a considerably weaker GPU, and likely still lower CPU performance.
One of us doesn't see well, that's clear.

You've so far failed to prove the actual cores are capable of sub-1w. We simply don't know the Frequency vs Consumption relationship, nor the IPC of the chip yet.
Are you talking about Atom ? Or what ?
If it's Atom you should check this : http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id...ec-codes=SLB6Q.