MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 344

Thread: Intel plans to deliberately limit Sandy Bridge overclocking

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Booj View Post
    Wouldn't there be a pcie multiplier? just drop the pcie multi as bclk increases. Sounds easy enough.. Maybe thats the extra level of complexity being talked about heh... Getting ram, uncore, qpi, cpu and pcie to all play nice
    That is where it is locked I would suspect, I have never seen a PCIe ratio/multiplier option in a BIOS, however i would suppose it possible or existed on boards I never owned. Typically, the PCIe on the chipset has it's own clock, separate from the system clock. Clarksdale/Allendale have the PCIe on the CPU but also has it's own clock -- supplied by the board.

    yes, that is the level of complexity, the tight integration of all the different IOs. Sux for the enthusiast, but great for the volume OEMs and system builders -- two less specifications to design two (two different clock generators and the associated traces).
    Last edited by JumpingJack; 09-11-2010 at 09:15 PM.
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •