Link to Intel saying running 1 core is alright please?
I didn't say what you said was FUD. This is;
I should have used a separator or something, sorry my bad!Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Again, the system is not changing the settings, USERS ARE! I know 10 folks using this processor, 6 have them overclocked. Not one has died but none of the users are disabling cores. Now if any of those folks not doing this had any of the processors Die, I'd join in on this.
So if I gave my processor too much voltage (available), and too high of a multiplier (unlocked version that 980X is) (available) and killed it, then that's Intel's fault as well? OTOH, maybe Intel should warn folks not to do this"* so I'm NOT totally opposed to what you're saying. **This = disable all but one core.Originally Posted by Bun-Bun
Maybe motherboard BIOS makers should add a warning in RED when these problem causing settings are used or remove them. All I'm saying is that the action that caused this problem isn't likely to affect 99.998% of folks using this processor. They are not dieing, they are being killed=pOriginally Posted by Intel Support
Here's what started some of this;
He's not talking about shutting down all but one core. He states that even shutting down two cores as well. There is not a Phenomenon because 1/999,980th of the one million or so 980x sold will have someone disabling all but one Core IMHO. Now if this was something the OS or an app was causing, then I'd go along with you guys!As does to all guys who got the CPUs which suffer from the same phenomenon. Whether they applied excessive voltage is irrelevant.
and
CPU dying on stock by only shutting a couple of cores off
Bookmarks