For some reason, I think this is more about pricing than anything. It would seem too screwed up if the 6850 never caught up to the 5870 when there is only a 15 percent between the 5850 and the 5870. It would have to be like only 10% faster and to call that a 6850 would be shameful and misleading.
It would kind of mirror what NV has done with gtx 285 and gtx 275 those and could simply be a super minor update.
But only 10% difference. This could be fake and all but considering the timing of this lineup and the obvious flaws found in some of the benchmarks results, this appears to be more genuine.
Who says the 4 D shader rumors are true those. This could simply be 1920 5 d shader like the previous gen which would yield between 10-20% more performance, but even that I think would be too conservative for AMD. However, all AMD needs to do right now to slap NV around is a conservative addition, as their current generation is beating NV pretty bad except for the gtx 460 when you include power consumption. If we look at it from that perspective, the performance falls exactly in line with this chart.
Their is one conflict however with the above chart, If AMD is going to have a 384 bit bus, why would they need ddr clocked at 1.5(6ghz effective) ghz? Thats too much bandwidth for any card.
Bookmarks