MMM
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: parallel gpu blocks

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    615

    parallel gpu blocks



    highres:http://www.paddedcellinc.org/~shane/...ock+config.jpg

    is this a correct configuration of 2 parallel cards? i swear i've seen a bunch of people say that it's better than one tube going between them, but after searching for a couple hours about i can't quite find anything. they're 2 DD 8800GTX blocks.

    Is there something i should be doing different? this configuration reeeeealy works well with the space i have in my case.

    ( i know the compression fitting aren't on right, I'm only in the Look portion of the tubes seeing if this is okay or not )

    again, i searched for a couple hours about this and i either suck at searching ( i prolly do ) or something else : ).
    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig
    you know you're addicted to watercooling when:
    Quote Originally Posted by Onoff312 View Post
    You started with a $200-400 budget and have ended up spending over $1000-2000

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by penguins View Post


    highres:http://www.paddedcellinc.org/~shane/...ock+config.jpg

    is this a correct configuration of 2 parallel cards? i swear i've seen a bunch of people say that it's better than one tube going between them, but after searching for a couple hours about i can't quite find anything. they're 2 DD 8800GTX blocks.

    Is there something i should be doing different? this configuration reeeeealy works well with the space i have in my case.

    ( i know the compression fitting aren't on right, I'm only in the Look portion of the tubes seeing if this is okay or not )

    again, i searched for a couple hours about this and i either suck at searching ( i prolly do ) or something else : ).
    Nope you have to switch the inlet and/or outlet they can not be on the same "tube" the way you have it the water will completely bypass the cards.

    you need:

    plug 90
    link link
    90 plug

    or

    90 plug
    link link
    plug 90
    i7 860 @ 4.3 GHz || Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7 || G.Skill Ripjaw 8GB 2000MHz w/ Fan || Swiftech XT CPU Block
    MCP355 w/ XSPC Res Top || MCR320-QP || 2 x BlackIce GTX 120|| WD 750GB Caviar Black RAID 0
    Corsair HX1000w || CoolerMaster ATCS 840 || OCZ Agility 60GB SSD RAID 0 || Lamptron FC-5
    2 x Asus EAH5850 DirectCU TOP w/ EK Nickel/Acetal Water Blocks || EVGA 8800GTX physx

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    61
    I have to agree...having an interconnect on both ports between cards isn't likely to improve performance. You're basically giving the water a straight line shot passing by both blocks without circulating through them.

    With most GPU blocks I've seen, water enters the block through one port and then is forced to circulate around inside the block before it can exit the other port. This is done by physically blocking the flow of water so it can't just scoot sideways from one port to the other and then out. You're bypassing that intentional blockage by having the left interconnect (based on your picture). Remove the left interconnect, leave the right one, and water is forced through the block of one card, then through the interconnect, then through the second card, then out.

    With both interconnects the way they are in that picture, water entering the first block has two options: (Assuming the bottom card is the first one in the loop and water exits the assembly through the top card).

    1) Push the water that came before it through the block, then through the right interconnect, then through the second block, then up.

    2) Push the water in the left interconnect up and then exit through the top.

    On the other hand, if the loop is set up so that water is entering the top card first and then down through the bottom, I would expect it would be even worse because you'd have the added issue of gravity encouraging the water to just go straight down without circulating through the blocks.

    Water will take the path of least resistance (just like me ), which means the flow through the blocks with your current setup will be slow at best, stagnant at worst.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    487
    Yeah you have to have the inlet and outlet on separate sides like this



    Also I have tested this same parallel setup with the inlet and outlet on the top card because I didn't have a 90 degree at the time for the bottom card and the temps were about the same. This setup with the inlet on one card and the outlet on another is the preferred method though.
    Last edited by Section8; 08-22-2010 at 04:17 PM.

    Intel Core i7-2600K---> Koolance 370
    3 X EVGA 480 GTX SC's Watercooled--> Koolance VID-NX480 blocks, HWLabs GTX 480, Liang D5 Vario
    Koolance RP-45X2 Reservoir
    Corsair Obsidian 800D
    Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3 MB
    SILVERSTONE ST1500 1500W PSU
    16G CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT (4 x 4GB) PC3 12800
    2 X Kingston HyperX SH100S3B/120G SATA 3 in RAID 0
    1 X WD Caviar Black 1TB
    Dell 3007 WFP-HC
    Z-5500's
    Windows 7 64bit

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    615
    so you're saying the same middle part, just move one 90* to the other port? your picture is pretty crazy dark and hard to see, so idk if each card has a bridge in the middle or not? like change my top 90* to the port to the left?
    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig
    you know you're addicted to watercooling when:
    Quote Originally Posted by Onoff312 View Post
    You started with a $200-400 budget and have ended up spending over $1000-2000

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    321
    Yeah move fitting in the bottom card to the rear most port.

    You can get away with both fittings connected to the top two but its not as efficient, but by having the two connected on the same side like that the water will just go straight down and out without going into the blocks.
    | Completed: Project "Simples" | Custom TJ07 | P67A-UD3 | 2600K | GTX460 | MCR320+MCR220 | DDC 18W+XSPC Res |
    | In progress: Project "Weebeastie" | A70B | P6T7 WS | i7-970 | 4xGTX470 | PA120.3+RX240+TFC120 | XSPC Dual-Pump-BayRes |
    | In progress: Project "Gemini" | PC-P80B | EVGA SR-2 | 2xX5650 | 7100GS | PA140.3 | EK DCP-4.0 |

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    487
    Quote Originally Posted by penguins View Post
    so you're saying the same middle part, just move one 90* to the other port? your picture is pretty crazy dark and hard to see, so idk if each card has a bridge in the middle or not? like change my top 90* to the port to the left?
    Yes keep them the same in the middle just move your bottom fitting over to the other side. Mine is hard to see because my links that connect each card are clear polycarbonate Bitspower SLI fittings

    Intel Core i7-2600K---> Koolance 370
    3 X EVGA 480 GTX SC's Watercooled--> Koolance VID-NX480 blocks, HWLabs GTX 480, Liang D5 Vario
    Koolance RP-45X2 Reservoir
    Corsair Obsidian 800D
    Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3 MB
    SILVERSTONE ST1500 1500W PSU
    16G CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT (4 x 4GB) PC3 12800
    2 X Kingston HyperX SH100S3B/120G SATA 3 in RAID 0
    1 X WD Caviar Black 1TB
    Dell 3007 WFP-HC
    Z-5500's
    Windows 7 64bit

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    615
    i think it's hard to see cause the lights are off : ). but that's just me! thanks i'll switch that up... : ) just bled the CPU Loop i think i like DDCs on 5v aLot better than 12v.. man tehy just create air bubbles on 12. lol..
    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig
    you know you're addicted to watercooling when:
    Quote Originally Posted by Onoff312 View Post
    You started with a $200-400 budget and have ended up spending over $1000-2000

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •