Both 5870 and 480 unable to handle Starcraft II official campaign at 30 fps

[tajoh111]

i think that he is saying that NV payed them off to only put that up for ati, as its a site that always is pro NV and is know to bench things to favor them. but this would happen with NV or any1 with that system as its all cpu. just look at it, each attack on each unit has like 10 roles, then when u have over a hounded units all needing the cpu on a single threaded game what else would happen.

this would happen with anything and thats what i think its the comment is for, but i dont see any1 picking a card to play SC2 as its fully playable even with low fps as its an RTS.

When has chiphell become NV favorable?

I have seen alot of leaks from them that have made NV look unfavorable, especially with unreleased products.

http://www.techreaction.net/2010/03/...h-the-fingers/

E.g gtx 470 vs 5870 in the above article. If they are always pro-nvidia, explain the above article.

http://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f...s-beans-71048/

The above is more accurate than anything and does not seem pro nvidia at all.

Chiphell is way more known for early hardware leaks than anything.

It sounds like your trying to explain a rationalize something, but your just talking out of your ass.