Results 1 to 25 of 395

Thread: Geforce GTX460: Overclocking and 3DMark results

Hybrid View

  1. 06-23-2010, 08:45 AM #1
    Helloworld_98
    Helloworld_98 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    Quote Originally Posted by Loque View Post
    fermi shrink or no thx..
    impatient much?
    i7 920 @ 4GHz 1.25v
    GTX 470 @ 859MHz 1062mv
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-23-2010, 09:03 AM #2
    Sam_oslo
    Sam_oslo is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    This looks good, and the OC headroom is impressive. It would be interesting to see some tests on 1GB/256-bit too.

    ► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    ► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    ► Silver Arrow , push/pull
    ► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    ► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    ► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    ► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    ► EVGA SR-2 , A50
    ► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    ► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    ► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    ► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    ► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    ► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-23-2010, 09:33 AM #3
    Sentential
    Sentential is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Send a message via ICQ to Sentential Send a message via AIM to Sentential Send a message via MSN to Sentential Send a message via Yahoo to Sentential
    Not impressed. The quest for the overclocked part is a fallacy, gaurnteed clocks are what matter here not potential. For all we know that could be a center cut best bet card or it could be the overall average; at this point we dont know. There have been a number of these cards floating around that people buy for the sake of overclocking only to have the rug pulled out from beneath them.

    The HD5850 was hot until we couldn't adjust voltage, same thing with the GTX470. Once the non-ref PCBs hit this card will be a dud just like the other 2 before it.

    Even still, going based of what they said a 900mhz 460 @ 192bit only just matched a 600mhz GTX 470. Lets not forget that the 470 with volts does 700-800+ which will wipe the floor with the aftermentioned card.

    The only thing I see coming out of this is a price drop on the ATi cards and nothing more. The 460 is an interesting card but I fail to see how its a game changer.

    Now if this was the GT212 totally different story but this card is going up against a GTX470 / HD5850. Why in the world would anyone buy this over either two?
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
    Heatware: 13-0-0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-23-2010, 09:49 AM #4
    -Sweeper_
    -Sweeper_ is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    Now if this was the GT212 totally different story but this card is going up against a GTX470 / HD5850. Why in the world would anyone buy this over either two?
    it is actually going up against the HD5830, and it'll probably be a better buy for the same price, which should force ATI to put the HD5850 at U$250 (or U$260, the MSRP at launch)...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-23-2010, 09:55 AM #5
    Sentential
    Sentential is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Send a message via ICQ to Sentential Send a message via AIM to Sentential Send a message via MSN to Sentential Send a message via Yahoo to Sentential
    Quote Originally Posted by -Sweeper_ View Post
    it is actually going up against the HD5830, and it'll probably be a better buy for the same price, which should force ATI to put the HD5850 at U$250 (or U$260, the MSRP at launch)...
    Exactally right, dont get me wrong this is a solid card but this would be the next 9600GT not 8800GT
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
    Heatware: 13-0-0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-23-2010, 10:11 AM #6
    -Sweeper_
    -Sweeper_ is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    Exactally right, dont get me wrong this is a solid card but this would be the next 9600GT not 8800GT
    yeah
    I'm curious about what they could do with the rumoured ''full GF104'' (384 SPs) card

    GTX470-like performance or more for ~U$300 would be cool
    Last edited by -Sweeper_; 06-23-2010 at 10:18 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-01-2010, 07:41 AM #7
    Jowy Atreides
    Jowy Atreides is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Helloworld_98 View Post
    impatient much?
    Well, he waited 9 months for it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules