MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 72

Thread: GPU Benchmarking Methods Investigated: Fact vs. Fiction

Threaded View

  1. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    577
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    +1.

    People don't want to sit there for 2 minutes looking at linear graphs and charts. They want to see the result and see it quick.



    You do know what median means right? Middle. Median of what? Median of FPS? What? The Mode is the most.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median

    Median is the "middle" of a series of numbers. So if you have 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...2 is the median number. Having the Median number would allow you to know on which side of the average you will get most of the time. Average mean can be heavily skewed by massive jumps in data (or FPS here) or massive drops.

    Let's say its 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 100 the average mean would be 18, however the mean would 1-2 (1.5). In terms of FPS, if you have a lot of an average of 60, a minimum of 20, and a median of 65 will tell you that getting 20 FPS is not very likely, but if the median was 30, it would tell you that you end up lower than 60 quite often, but there are some high peaks skewing it higher.
    Last edited by Stukov; 06-19-2010 at 12:20 AM.
    --Intel i5 3570k 4.4ghz (stock volts) - Corsair H100 - 6970 UL XFX 2GB - - Asrock Z77 Professional - 16GB Gskill 1866mhz - 2x90GB Agility 3 - WD640GB - 2xWD320GB - 2TB Samsung Spinpoint F4 - Audigy-- --NZXT Phantom - Samsung SATA DVD--(old systems Intel E8400 Wolfdale/Asus P45, AMD965BEC3 790X, Antec 180, Sapphire 4870 X2 (dead twice))

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •