haven't seen some one put different thermalpastes on the 480 (STOCK)
will it make a big difference ?
haven't seen some one put different thermalpastes on the 480 (STOCK)
will it make a big difference ?
No, a better paste only changes the time it takes for the heat to reach the HS. On stock you're still limited by the fan.
Q9650@4000 - Apogee GTX, Gigabyte X48-DS5, 8GB Corsair Dominator XMS2-8500, GTX480 El cheapo Asetek block, Audiophile 192 + Adam-A7, Win7
if it can do better to 470 & it can with 480 also ......... go ahead man
It will surely improve 2-3c may be![]()
funny, when i changed the TIM on my 9800gx2 load temps were reduced by 10c. i believe faster heat transfer is only half of the story, true the HSF assembly can only dispurse so much heat, but increasing the rate at which that heat is removed from the gpu makes the HSF more efficient thus reducing load temps.![]()
thats bs :P
by that definition there would be no difference between thermal materials whatsoever except for higher deltas from the average under load and in idle...
if you thermally isolate a heatsource it doesnt just slow down the spread of heat, it results in higher temperatures as well, just think about it...
took mine apart to throw a pot on....TIM was epic fail as usual lol
I like the direct heat pipe contact though. Its just there was about 4x the amount of necessary tim slimmed on there so im sure you could shave the usual 5c or so off with good stuff.
Also be careful taking the cooler off. The screws are locktited in and suppper easy to strip.
It doesn't work like that - you must have had faulty paste from the beginning, like an air pockets. In order to see such a big change.
If it makes it easier, see the paste as a thin layer of copper film. There is no heat stored in the paste as such, its just a pass through and with the Copper Heat Spreader standard today on chips you already have a big surface to work with.
But, as you said. There might be sloppy applications on the stock cards you get, and the paste you have on only works to 70-80%. Then checking and changing can be a big boost - and any paste you use will give good results.
Last edited by Gilhooley; 04-28-2010 at 10:05 AM.
Q9650@4000 - Apogee GTX, Gigabyte X48-DS5, 8GB Corsair Dominator XMS2-8500, GTX480 El cheapo Asetek block, Audiophile 192 + Adam-A7, Win7
Q9650@4000 - Apogee GTX, Gigabyte X48-DS5, 8GB Corsair Dominator XMS2-8500, GTX480 El cheapo Asetek block, Audiophile 192 + Adam-A7, Win7
the best way to apply thermal paste is to use as little as possible since it doesnt transfair heat as well as metal.
but thats tricky to do and you gotta make sure the install is 100% fine and not angled at all...
what most mfcs do is use thermal pads, which is what this is as well on the 470s and 480s... its a 1mm thick pad which is a lot easier to install...
if youd use more thermal paste it might just run out at one end, a thermal pad cant... why they used such a thick pad idk... i think somebody at nvidia thought they need it to fill all the gaps between the heatsink/heatpipes and the gpu shim... but thats stupid... you sacrifice efficiency where it matters, where the heatsink and gpu shim make contact, for having better but still very bad contact between the gpus shim and a gap between the heatpipes which can be 1mm deep...
ls there a thread for this
i think ill go with the tx-2
as u can see its better than the mx2
http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/tuniq_tx2/3.htm
how did u apply the thermalpaste any tips u can give me
An efficient heatsink assembly works by:
1. Create a large surface area for the heat exchange to take place between the fins and air.
2. Create movement of air surrounding the heatsink. Be it active i.e. fans or passive i.e. convection of air.
3. A way for the heat to be efficiently moved from the source to the fins.
4. Most importantly there must be a delta between the fins of the heatsink and the surrounding air.
Any one of the points listed above are important for an efficient running HSF, and increasing the effectiveness of any one of them increases the efficiency even further.
There are essentially 2 places where there is a temperature delta on something like the graphics card or CPU HSF assembly, one is between the GPU/HSF and the other is the HSF/Air.
By applying a better thermal paste, you are lowering the delta between the GPU and the HSF, therefore increasing the delta between the HSF and the air passing through, therefore the HSF becomes more efficient, ergo either the GPU runs cooler at the same fan speed or the fan speed decreases but the GPU temperature stays the same.
Let's look at it another way; the GPU produces the same amount of heat in either case. By reducing the heat conductivity of the TIM, the GPU/HSF delta have to be increased to shift the same amount of heat between the 2 surfaces, therefore the GPU becomes hotter, and/or the fan spins up to compensate the rise in GPU temp.
Try using a drop of olive oil as your TIM next time. By your logic it will work as well as MX3.![]()
and why would that be?
hmmm i might have to try that on my msi gts260 twin frozr...
with 100% fanspeed i get 70C load temps with 27C ambient... that cant be right for a 5heatpipe heatsink... and this is stock everything!
dont laugh! i did that once
on a cpu heatsink tho... didnt have any thermal paste and used olive oil...
couldnt get rid of the smell after that no matter how much i cleaned hahah
everytime i loaded the cpu, there it was again, that olive oil smell![]()
it worked pretty well... good enough...
i think 5-10C worse temps than vanilla white thermal paste...
it corroded the heatsink tho, in a weird way... idk itf it was corrosion or a crust of dried up olive oil tbh... but it was hard to remove from the heatsink base![]()
Any tips for disassembling these cards without stripping the screws?
amen to that....alot of people seem to forget this.
i'v seen similar temp drops with mine after cleaning the stock stuff up,it was twice as bad as usally with the gx2.
the trick to not sripping the screws is...
1 to have two fine "phillips" screwdrivers one normal small and one a tad smaller,for the different size screws
2 have a vice grip or channel locks to turn the screwdriver as leverage.
my 4 core screws were "loose" but the others were tight like a.
Last edited by cowie; 04-30-2010 at 05:41 PM.
_________________
if anybody has a cam and wants to do it, make a quick video guide and put it on youtube!![]()
On my EVGA 470... I didnt have the over excessive amount of TIM...I was kinda suprized. It actually looked like it was put on with some concern ( though I know it wasnt ).
But, what I have noticed, on mine anyways, is the main part of the cooler on the die* isnt very flat/smooth at all...even though it is a direct contact** it is very uneven, grooved ** and also, the screws that hold it in contact, will only go down as far as the stop* not allowing a very solid pressure...I can after tightening as far as it will allow, still easily move the cooler by rotating it...
I plan on later today adding ( need to see if the screws can be removed, I havent checked yet , but im sure they can be) some small washers under the screw heads to apply a more positive* solid pressure... after applying AC5 Im still not really seeing anything substantial as far as better cooling ...** maybe 1-2 c on load...about the same at idle...
whoever first comes out with a really good solid** base cooler that is flat and polished** will sell them like cupcakes at a fat kids party**
same as most enthusiasts... all this spreading tim with a card etc is bs if you ask me... one blob in the center and thats it... doing funny suff like zig zag lines, a cross or especially circle are retarded ideas cause they make it more likely for air bubbles to form...
flashnc, hmmm did the evga stuff look the same as on other cards?
blue thick soft chewing gum stuff?
several people reported that their evga card looks like the heatsink had been removed already... could be that evga replaced the stock tim cause they found it sucked...
Bookmarks