Page 19 of 123 FirstFirst ... 9161718192021222969119 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 475 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

  1. #451
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    GTX500: 512sp, $700
    GTX490: ?
    GTX480: 480sp, $500
    GTX470: 448sp, $350

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  2. #452
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    GTX512: 512sp, $700
    GTX480: 480sp, $500
    GTX470: 448sp, $350

    Lol @ the moniker GTX512.

  3. #453
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    This busy guy packing cards has a good sense of humor.
    Other than that please find another source.

  4. #454
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by -Sweeper_ View Post
    two versions of the GTX480?
    Exactly.

    The Zotac GTX480 speed version in flames. Hot.



    The Zotac GTX480. Icy Cool... br


  5. #455
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Free Razer mice with Zotac?

    Total win. Imperator with ma 480 *cool guy face*

  6. #456
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    533
    Didn't we hear, that we won't see Fermi based cards from XFX in the first wave? Who was it, so I can ignore him from now on



    http://translate.google.com/translat...om%2F9888.html

  7. #457
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    The launch of the GeForce GTX 400 series is just weeks away and we finally got our samples. We can't share any more specific details on the card or architecture, but we will try to make up for it at launch day. During the day we received some information from a big Swedish distributor that could confirm the pricing of the GeForce GTX 400 family.

    The MSRP will be around 5100 SEK (divide by ten to get USB/EUR) for the top model GeForce GTX 480 and around 3600 ($360) for GeForce GTX 470. The prices on launch day may vary a bit depending the store and even if the prices are averaged it shows how NVIDIA intends to price the cards.
    http://www.nordichardware.com/en/com...00-prices.html

  8. #458
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    Updated with final clocks too :

    GeForce GTX 480 : 480 SP, 700/1401/1848MHz core/shader/mem, 384-bit, 1536MB, 295W TDP, US$499

    GeForce GTX 470 : 448 SP, 607/1215/1674MHz core/shader/mem, 320-bit, 1280MB, 225W TDP, US$349
    1401 for memory or shader? Clockspeeds do not make much sense. If 1848Mhz is shader clock thats amazing (besides the 700Mhz core clock).

    --lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
    -- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
    -- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
    - GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
    - HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
    Primary Monitor - Samsung T260

  9. #459
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidReactor View Post
    1401 for memory or shader? Clockspeeds do not make much sense. If 1848Mhz is shader clock thats amazing (besides the 700Mhz core clock).

    The quote claims 1401 shader... it says core/mem/shader respectively.

  10. #460
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidReactor View Post
    1401 for memory or shader? Clockspeeds do not make much sense. If 1848Mhz is shader clock thats amazing (besides the 700Mhz core clock).

    1401 is shader's clock.GF100's core clock is GPC clock,not the ROP/L2 clock,so GF100's core clock is half of the shader's clock.

  11. #461
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Looks like the 480 had some units disabled in exchange for higher clocks

    The 470 has seriously low memory clocks though

  12. #462
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Vardant View Post
    Didn't we hear, that we won't see Fermi based cards from XFX in the first wave? Who was it, so I can ignore him from now on



    http://translate.google.com/translat...om%2F9888.html
    You do realize that is a mockup, right? Don't you find it strange that they don't have a full card to take pics with?
    We will see about who is shipping this month... cause it should be no one, expect Nvidia to AIBs.
    Last edited by LordEC911; 03-19-2010 at 12:04 AM.
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  13. #463
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    So is it March 26 or April 6?

    What happens with all the chips with less than 448SP functioning?
    After 20+ months since GT200, only 2 models to be launched?? 0_o?

    Why is nobody pounding fists at GTX460...

    Unless nVidia has a really BIG SECRET, in a week or 2, there will be really strange product lineup situation:
    GTX480/470 - for shizzle
    empty
    empty
    formerly GTX285 which is EOL
    empty
    GTX260/275 - low volumes
    good old G90's...

    =============
    EDIT: vs AMD with full lineup.. no holes, no redundancy.. neat and organized.
    5970, 5870, 5850, 5830 (replacing 4890), 5770 (replacing 4850/4770), 5750, 56xx etc
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-19-2010 at 12:09 AM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  14. #464
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Hopefully GTX 470 will have a decent OC and not significantly lowered volts, 750/1500/1950 on stock cooler is whereabouts I hope the max clocks on stock cooler/volts would be.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  15. #465
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Hope too ... 750/1500/1950 on OC will be great

  16. #466
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by onethreehill View Post
    So $510 for the 480? And how much is the 5870 currently?
    Antec 900
    Corsair TX750
    Gigabyte EP45 UD3P
    Q9550 E0 500x8 4.0 GHZ 1.360v
    ECO A.L.C Cooler with Gentle Typhoon PushPull
    Kingston HyperX T1 5-5-5-18 1:1
    XFX Radeon 6950 @ 880/1300 (Shader unlocked)
    WD Caviar Black 2 x 640GB - Short Stroked 120GB RAID0 128KB Stripe - 540GB RAID1

  17. #467
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Hope too ... 750/1500/1950 on OC will be great
    Altough I'm sure it won't be quite that high in average for GTX 470 but probably for good samples, maybe 700~730 core, 1450~1500 shader and 1900 mem is probably more reasonable expection for a fermi card in avg but that would still be a decent OC.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 03-19-2010 at 12:20 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  18. #468
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    Hopefully GTX 470 will have a decent OC and not significantly lowered volts, 750/1500/1950 on stock cooler is whereabouts I hope the max clocks on stock cooler/volts would be.
    GTX480 is suppose to be 700MHz with TDP barely below 300W. How in gods name do you expect to overclock GTX470 to 750MHz?

    It's not happening. Not on 2x6pin and crappy PCB that we've seen.

  19. #469
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    429
    Haven't posted in a while but figured I'd give my 2 cents. I had 2xGTX 280 SLI from Nov 08 till about 2 weeks ago. I sold one of my GTX 280s fairly cheap (current ebay pricing) and still running one of them. I have a stack of games here waiting to be played Crysis, COD4,5, Bioshock 1&2, The Witcher, Mass Effect 1&2, Assassin's Creed, Oblivion, Dragon Age, Fallout 3, Fear 1&2 and probably 1 or 2 others.

    I'm currently playing BF:BC2 and pretty addicted to it, why do I have this stack of games waiting? Because I run a 3008WFP @ 2560x1600 and just can't play these awesome games with anything less than max settings and it has to be SMOOTH gameplay, level of AA not that important but 4x is nice to have. I'm on a 790i board with 8GB DDR3 @ 1680mhz with E8400 @ 4Ghz and I'm stuck with not being able to run crossfire. I invested money into Samsung 256GB SSD drives bought 3 of them put into Raid0 (spent/wasted $2100) which was quite foolish I admit but income was better before than it is right now.

    I've been anticipating Fermi GPU (GTX 480) for a while now and I can't really remember a GPU that's had this much secrecy. I have a friend in a board partner company that said he's been told he can lose his job if he says anything... Which I find very odd, is this secrecy to get early adopter's money BEFORE any benches and real performance numbers??? Disappointed to see 512 SP slashed to 480 SP, however as mentioned the clock speed of GPU seems higher than was expected. I've had to change BF:BC2 to Medium graphics @ 2560x1600 to ensure it is fluid when there is a lot of smoke/fire which tends to happen a lot.

    I really hope I don't regret buying these when they come out as I'll be 2xGTX 480 SLI, last ATI card I had was X1900XTX or X1950XTX something like that and main game was BF2 back then, there were horrible shader glitches and very jagged AA issues. Really hated the ATI Catalyst drivers as well so I really don't want to go back to ATI. With all of the specs and the card pushing the 300W barrier of PCI-E compliance along with 3 billion transistors I really hope performance matches the card specs. I'm thinking 1xGTX 480 should be 2xGTX 280 since there are double the SPs, higher clock (my GTX 280 was 615mhz) faster and more ram. If so then 2xGTX 480 would be similar to 4xGTX 280 which I'd expect will give me the performance I need for another 12-18 months?

    Apologies for long post, I don't post often, any thoughts on my thinking here?
    PC1 EVGA Nvidia 790i Ultra | E8400 Retail @ 4.05GHz 1.35v | 8GB Mushkin Ascent @ DDR3-1680 | 2xBFG GTX 280 SLI @ stock | 30" Dell 3008WFP @ 2560x1600 XHD | XFI Fatality | 3x256GB Corsair(Samsung) SSD Raid0 & 1TB Samsung Backup | LG DVD / CDRW | NEC DVD DL 16x | CoolerMaster Stacker 830 8x120mm high 110 CFM per fan| 1000w Corsair SLI certified | Scythe Infinity (dremel mod to avoid caps on board)

    PC2 (Wife) ASUS P5WDH Bios 1101 | E6400 Retail @ 3.2 | 4GB Corsair 6400C4 | 1xBFG GTX 260 @ stock | 24" Dell 2405FPW @ 1920x1200 XHD | XFI Xtrememusic | 2x150G Raptor Raid0 & 1TB WD Backup | Pioneer DVD | CoolerMaster Stacker 830 | 850w PCP&C | Stock HSF

  20. #470
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenTiger View Post
    The quote claims 1401 shader... it says core/mem/shader respectively.
    Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
    1401 is shader's clock.GF100's core clock is GPC clock,not the ROP/L2 clock,so GF100's core clock is half of the shader's clock.
    So...is 1850Mhz already GDDR5 doubled speed? As in 925Mhz actual or 3700Mhz after the 4x

    I dont think any of the 7Ghz GDDR5 chips are out yet thats why I am wondering about the memory speeds.
    --lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
    -- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
    -- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
    - GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
    - HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
    Primary Monitor - Samsung T260

  21. #471
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidReactor View Post
    So...is 1850Mhz already GDDR5 doubled speed? As in 925Mhz actual or 3700Mhz after the 4x

    I dont think any of the 7Ghz GDDR5 chips are out yet thats why I am wondering about the memory speeds.
    If you align the previous info about the GTX 470 having 800Mhz (3.2G) GDDR5, it's 3.7Ghz for the GTX 480 here.

    >6Ghz speeds are not really here yet. Signal robustness (errors?) and the fact that a memory controller from a 2008/9 tapeout design probably did not account for such speeds.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  22. #472
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    How much faster does a SLI gtx 480 have to be to match quadfire 5970s. Considering the only resolution where such power shows itself is 2500*1600 where video memory will play a limiting effect and dualcard sli will scale better than quadfire, I can imagine for people with 30" monitors the gtx 480 might look like a better card in alot of ways. Would SLI gtx 480 at 1.2(5870) be match quadfire 5970 at 2500*1600 considering scaling issues with the 5970?

    The power consumption looks awful those. This near 300 watts is a disaster in so many ways. I think classified editions of such cards won't be all for not anymore, as this card looks like it can use another 8 pin or something. I hope a company comes out with a custom PCB without the hole and a standard waterblock.

    The refresh looks like the card to buy those the gtx 485 should be an overclockers dream, if they are indeed already hitting 700/1400 with this current revision.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 03-19-2010 at 02:33 AM.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  23. #473
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Czech Republic, 50°4'52.22"N, 14°23'30.45"E
    Posts
    474
    Quote Originally Posted by ~CS~ View Post
    NVIDIA moving media embargo to March 29th


    http://www.nordichardware.com/en/com...arch-29th.html
    This remembered me how Fuad talked the Fermi is Q3 which could mean we'll see them the last day of march
    Last edited by Behemot; 03-19-2010 at 02:28 AM. Reason: typo
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    I think we should start a new "Fermi part <InsertNumberHere>" thread each time it's delayed in this fashion!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Heck, I think we should start a whole new forum dedicated to hardware delays.

  24. #474
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    247
    Is there any way of knowing how the SLI GTX 480 will scale?

  25. #475
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    How much faster does a SLI gtx 480 have to be to match quadfire 5970s. Considering the only resolution where such power shows itself is 2500*1600 where video memory will play a limiting effect and dualcard sli will scale better than quadfire, I can imagine for people with 30" monitors the gtx 480 might look like a better card in alot of ways. Would SLI gtx 480 at 1.2(5870) be match quadfire 5970 at 2500*1600 considering scaling issues with the 5970?

    The power consumption looks awful those. This near 300 watts is a disaster in so many ways. I think classified editions of such cards won't be all for not anymore, as this card looks like it can use another 8 pin or something. I hope a company comes out with a custom PCB without the hole and a standard waterblock.

    The refresh looks like the card to buy those the gtx 485 should be an overclockers dream, if they are indeed already hitting 700/1400 with this current revision.
    there won't be any 20 percent if shader difference between 470 and 480 is 32 only imho
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

Page 19 of 123 FirstFirst ... 9161718192021222969119 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •