Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 78

Thread: GeForce 196.75 WHQL: Up to 30% increase in performance

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574

    GeForce 196.75 WHQL: Up to 30% increase in performance

    http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_38167398/tm.htm

    Looks like there are great increases in single GPU systems, and even better at SLI systems.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    101
    Wow. Would like to see some benchies. Pretty impressive increases for a driver

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,084
    If they keep up the good work they don't have to release any new cards!
    Oh wait..

    Seriously though, this looks great, I get impressed every time they can squeese some more performance from the drivers.

  4. #4
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Anyone tried these in 3DM?
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    As long as these are performance increases in NEW games it is great. Otherwise, I don't want to see yet another 20% bump in Far Cry 2....

  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    If they keep up the good work they don't have to release any new cards!
    Oh wait..


    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Seriously though, this looks great, I get impressed every time they can squeese some more performance from the drivers.
    well it depends on how they achieve it...

    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    As long as these are performance increases in NEW games it is great. Otherwise, I don't want to see yet another 20% bump in Far Cry 2....
    exactly, and if it comes at even a slight decrease in image quality then id prefer to have worse perf but still good enough...

    no major performance boosts for a long time, and then all the sudden 15-30% performance boosts in several popular games that have been out for a long time? im sceptical about how they achieved that...
    Last edited by saaya; 03-02-2010 at 07:46 AM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    no major performance boosts for a long time, and then all the sudden 15-30% performance boosts in several popular games that have been out for a long time? im sceptical about how they achieved that...
    Again the magic performance-unlocking driver like in the Geforce FX era (Or was it 4?), right when ATI released a new set of cards?

    It's a possibility, but i don't think it's like that since they have been struggling against the HD5xxx series for too long. They surely would have come with this right after ATI made their move...

    Lots of people have bought ATI cards because they got tired of waiting for the mystical Fermi that nobody knows anything about to compare and decide.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Curragh.
    Posts
    1,294
    Quote Originally Posted by Pontos View Post
    Again the magic performance-unlocking driver like in the Geforce FX era (Or was it 4?), right when ATI released a new set of cards?

    It's a possibility, but i don't think it's like that since they have been struggling against the HD5xxx series for too long. They surely would have come with this right after ATI made their move...

    Lots of people have bought ATI cards because they got tired of waiting for the mystical Fermi that nobody knows anything about to compare and decide.
    It was the FX series, they gave a performance boost, but dropped in Image Quality over all.

    I really hope that didn't happen again and that it's not the only way they could get the GTX 480 to perform better than the 5870.

    If so they might lose more people.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    OMG 30% up? Maybe i should keep my GTX 295, who need needs Fermi aftr this

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  10. #10
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    As long as these are performance increases in NEW games it is great. Otherwise, I don't want to see yet another 20% bump in Far Cry 2....
    In Crysis, HAWX and L4D only unless I am missing something. And these are far from being new. I wonder how they manage to keep increasing the performance in Crysis, though. Are they rewriting the engine for the devs?!
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    54
    And some gift from nvidia driver download section on web :

    System Message

    Please try again at a later time. Sorry for the inconvenience.

    Intel E8400 @ 4GHz Q748A263 PD: 02/25/08.
    Asus Maximus Formula rev. 1.3G. Bios 1004.
    1GBx2 Corsair Dominator DDR1066 + AirFlow.
    Asus 8800GT TOP.
    Zalman CNPS9700 Led.
    Cooler Master CM690.
    15 229 3DMARK06

  12. #12
    Assistant Administrator systemviper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Newtown, CT
    Posts
    2,875
    it will be interesting to see some real world results...
    HWbot - Team: XtremeSystems
    XS cruncher - Team: XtremeSystems
    OCN Feedback
    HEAT


    *** Being kind is sometimes better then being right.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Looks like single card scores are only affected in Crysis: Warhead, Left 4 Dead and HawX. Looks like some huge SLI patches though.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    244
    guru3d.com has it also.

    testing now.

  15. #15
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Looks like single card scores are only affected in Crysis: Warhead, Left 4 Dead and HawX. Looks like some huge SLI patches though.
    Hm, maybe because of ATI's announcement of rewriting CFX code.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Hm, maybe because of ATI's announcement of rewriting CFX code.
    Maybe, but probably not. Typically, NVIDIA quarterly driver releases incorporate a massive number of SLI updates.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cable Management Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,308
    I can only hope this is true!! i may keep my 295, and grab a second when everyone sells for fermi... lets see some results!
    Project: HeadShot
    Intel i7 3770k | Corsair H100
    EVGA GTX-590 Classified | XSPC GTX 590 Waterblock
    Gigabyte G1.Sniper 2 MotherBoard | Swiftech MCR-320 Res/Rad/Pump
    16GB Corsair Vengeance Low Profile Ram
    Crucial M4 128GB / Intel X25-M 160GB / WD 1TB Black
    Corsair AX850W PSU
    27" Apple Cinema Display (2560x1440)
    Corsair 600t White
    Picture

    You best be Crunching and Folding/GPUgrid'ing!

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    763
    So is it any good? Cause the beta driver wouldn't install for me. It crashed half way through so I had to revert to the latest 195 driver. I'm a bit weary about trying this one out...

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    244
    working fine here.

    previous '06 best for me in 7 32bit was 16,700. With 196.75 I scored 17,400 just 5minutes ago. So a from me.

    Hope this applies to XP aswell, this should put me very close to 20k
    Last edited by THOMO; 03-02-2010 at 12:00 PM.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    836
    Anyone with a G80 or SLI G80 setup try this out yet?

    Ryzen 3800X @ 4.4Ghz
    MSI X570 Unify
    32GB G.Skill 3600Mhz CL14
    Sapphire Nitro Vega 64
    OCZ Gold 850W ZX Series
    Thermaltake LV10

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    A guy at DH with a GTX 280 is reporting higher AVG but lower min FPS in Crysis Warhead.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    These have to be single handidly the WORST sack of drivers I have EVER used. Constant bsods, msi afterburner causes instant lockups with drivers and I have yet to get SLI to work without a hardlock.

    Also dedicated physx is broken and does not appear to work anymore with this package. I am in the process of rolling them back as we speak if I can get this computer to remain responsive long enough to do so. If you are using windows 7 64bit STAY AWAY
    Last edited by Sentential; 03-02-2010 at 04:07 PM.
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    These have to be single handidly the WORST sack of drivers I have EVER used. Constant bsods, msi afterburner causes instant lockups with drivers and I have yet to get SLI to work without a hardlock.

    Also dedicated physx is broken and does not appear to work anymore with this package. I am in the process of rolling them back as we speak if I can get this computer to remain responsive long enough to do so. If you are using windows 7 64bit STAY AWAY
    I was about to download and install until I read this :facepalm:

    CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
    CPU Cooler:
    Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
    RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
    HDD:
    Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
    Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    Constant bsods, msi afterburner causes instant lockups with drivers and I have yet to get SLI to work without a hardlock. dedicated physx is broken and does not appear to work anymore
    sounds fun
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  25. #25
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    These have to be single handidly the WORST sack of drivers I have EVER used. Constant bsods, msi afterburner causes instant lockups with drivers and I have yet to get SLI to work without a hardlock.

    Also dedicated physx is broken and does not appear to work anymore with this package. I am in the process of rolling them back as we speak if I can get this computer to remain responsive long enough to do so. If you are using windows 7 64bit STAY AWAY
    Rivatuner seems to be working fine for me. I have yet to have a bsod or even a crash to desktop.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •