MMM
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 78

Thread: GeForce 196.75 WHQL: Up to 30% increase in performance

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    You don't get something for nothing.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    353
    No issues here with the new drivers. Saw a nice improvement in Vantage with and without physX. Crysis, Bioshock 2 and BFBC2 all ran just fine. This is with tri-sli 275's and Win7 64-bit.

  3. #28
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,413
    Just installed and played L4D2 on my Asus 1201N netbook (dual core Atom, ION, 2 gigs of ram, 1366x768 res I think) and it playable. THis is the only rig I will have for my personal use while on a nice 3-5 week tour with Nvidia I have to start next week. Installing the new AVP game to see if it will play as well.
    "Thing is, I no longer consider you a member but, rather a parasite...one that should be expunged."

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    I installed this and I'm still getting 30-40FPS on BC2 on my 275 GTX on my i7 rig, WTF? I'm seeing no improvement at all.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    866
    well i loaded the drivers and had no issues, some improvements in most games as well.

    one thing that pissed me off though, after installing them it would NOT at all let me use 1920x1080 @60hz with 32 bit color on my samsung tv. I noticed aero wasnt working the colors were off, went into the control panel and it was 1920x1080 @60hz 16bit color. changed to 32 bit color and it changed 60hz to 24hz, then changed that to 60hz and applied and it forced it into 1920x1080 @24hz 32 bit . i couldnt have both 32bit color and 60hz, damn driver, so i made a custom resolution of 1920x1080 @60hz 32bit color and that fixed it.
    This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
    This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.

    RIGGY
    case:Antec 1200
    MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
    CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
    MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
    PS:Corsair 650TX
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
    --Cooling--
    5x120mm 1x200mm
    Zalman 9700LED
    Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350


  6. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    37
    Drivers are working fine for me with a single GTX-260, W7 64. No improvement for me in L4D2 and only a small bump in Vantage, less than 100 points. I'm gonna try a few games later, but I'm not expecting much.
    1) (wifes) Gig EX58-UD5, Core i7 920 4.3GHz 1.312v, Pro Meg, Gig GTX-260 SO, Cor TX650, 6GB DDR3 1688 MHz, OCZ Agility2 60GB + 1TB Samsung HDD, Antec NSK 4482B

    2) (mine) Asus M4A88T-I, 1055T 3.94GHz 1.476v (turbo 4.23GHz), nb 2820MHz 1.225v, 8GB Gskill DDR3 so dimm 1520 MHz 9-9-9-24, Noctua NH-C12P, Diamond 5870 mild OC, OCZ Agility2 60GB SSD + 1TB Samsung HDD, antec earthwatts 650, Lian Li PC-Q06

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,144
    Installing on my 7950 GX2 and GTX 285 SLI PCs. I will test Crysis Warhead on both PCs and see what the performance change is.
    |-------Conner-------|



    RIP JimmyMoonDog

    2,147,222 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
    http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver,British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,178
    There is a driver sub-forum,no offence
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...splay.php?f=64

    30% increase from what? an IGP,a 7600gt, a GTX295 etc..


    World Community Grid's mission is to create the world's largest public computing grid to tackle projects that benefit humanity.
    Our success depends upon individuals collectively contributing their unused computer time to change the world for the better.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    These drivers are indeed horrible. First when I extracted the files from the .exe file, my anti virus scanner reported the setup.exe had a virus in it... WTF, and second whenever I played any video file with Media Classic Player the video file is laggy and I would have to restart the player in order to get it working normally again. Avoid installing this, I had to go back to the previous version.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    [M] - Belgium
    Posts
    1,744
    most likely these improvements are had under certain conditions.


    Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    394
    anyone tried this with win7 32 ? Wonder if it will increase 295 performance well ill try it out later today.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    As long as these are performance increases in NEW games it is great. Otherwise, I don't want to see yet another 20% bump in Far Cry 2....
    I've actually had a problem with new drivers significantly dropping performance in old games (see Oblivion.) Although, I definitely wouldn't consider Far Cry 2 old.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC USA
    Posts
    278
    Tried the drivers. Did see a bump in FPS in BC2. Went from max fps being around lower 90's to 128 fps. Avg 70-80 prior to these drivers. With these drivers 80-90. Now with these drivers Evga Precision wasnt working cause drivers were too new so I was running the cards stock vs. running them with my usually lil oc with the last beta drivers (700/1550/1220) In game settings were AA @ 8xQ, hbao on, everything on high yadda yadda yadda with 1920 x 1200 res. Didn't really notice a diff in IQ with these vs. the 196.34 betas. Pretty damn good results with stock cards IMO but got some bad in game crashing. That's the deal breaker. Happened liked 3x. No bsod's though.

    Previously I was playing BC2 SP for like 3hrs straight with the 196.34 betas and didn't get one crash. Soon as I installed the new drivers within say 15 mins in game, crash. I uninstalled the new drivers and installed the last official NV drivers with EVGA SLI Patch and didn't have any of the funky crashes I was getting with the 196.75 drivers.

    Tried Mass Effect 2 with 196.75 drivers too. Sli profile my a$$ lol. Never broke 62 fps. Then again couldn't break 62 fps with Mass 2 with the evga sli patch for the last official drivers either so eh. Didn't get any in game crashes though. Truth be told soon as I saw I wasn't breaking 62 fps didn't bother playing long. Probably 10 mins max.


    P.S. this was on Windows 7 64 bit.

    Update: Reinstalled new drivers. Evga Precision does seem to support the newer drivers. Wierd I thought it didnt the first time. So that bump in FPS was with the cards at my usual oc, not stock.
    Last edited by Trembledust; 03-03-2010 at 11:37 PM. Reason: Left out something
    Xeon w3520 oc'd to 4.2ghz w/ htt enabled
    Foxconn Bloodrage (G32 Bios)
    2 x Nvidia 285 gtx's (overclock varies. Most recent core: 700/ shaders: 1550/ ram: 1230)
    6gbs G-skill Trident ddr3 2000mhz ram @ 1604mhz (timings: 6 7 6 20 T1)
    Silverstone ST1000 1000W PSU
    WD RaptorX 150gb, WD 1tb, Seagate Perpendicular 320gb (non raid config)
    2 x LG Sata 22x DVD Burner
    Swiftech Apogee XT Extreme Water-block, Feser X-Changer 360mm Xtreme Performance Radiator, Alphacool Cape Coolplex Pro 10 External Reservior, Swiftech MCP655™ 12 VDC Pump, 3x Scythe 120mm fans, 1/2in tubing
    Creative X-Fi Titanium Sound Card
    Lian Li X-500 Case
    And a partridge in a peared tree

  14. #39
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Guys, it's not 30% performance improvement in ALL games, just a few titles...
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    I have installed this drivers yesterday's night. No real problems, everything seems ok (BF2:BC2, Bioshock 2, DIRT II, Borderlands ...) and no need to reboot, that's cool !

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by Trembledust View Post
    Tried the drivers. Did see a bump in FPS in BC2. Went from max fps being around lower 90's to 128 fps. Avg 70-80 prior to these drivers. With these drivers 80-90. Now with these drivers Evga Precision wasnt working cause drivers were too new so I was running the cards stock vs. running them with my usually lil oc with the last beta drivers (700/1550/1220) In game settings were AA @ 8xQ, hbao on, everything on high yadda yadda yadda with 1920 x 1200 res. Didn't really notice a diff in IQ with these vs. the 196.34 betas. Pretty damn good results with stock cards IMO but got some bad in game crashing. That's the deal breaker. Happened liked 3x. No bsod's though.

    Previously I was playing BC2 SP for like 3hrs straight with the 196.34 betas and didn't get one crash. Soon as I installed the new drivers within say 15 mins in game, crash. I uninstalled the new drivers and installed the last official NV drivers with EVGA SLI Patch and didn't have any of the funky crashes I was getting with the 196.75 drivers.

    Tried Mass Effect 2 with 196.75 drivers too. Sli profile my a$$ lol. Never broke 62 fps. Then again couldn't break 62 fps with Mass 2 with the evga sli patch for the last official drivers either so eh. Didn't get any in game crashes though. Truth be told soon as I saw I wasn't breaking 62 fps didn't bother playing long. Probably 10 mins max.


    P.S. this was on Windows 7 64 bit.

    Your issue with Mass Effect 2 is that the game engine caps framerate at 62fps.

    And seriously... if "beta" drivers on the nVidia side are that crashtastic I don't think I'm switching back. I have a near-zero tolerance for crashes, waste of time and happiness :/
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  17. #42
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    722
    Who need a 28% SLI boost in L4D when it runs fine on most computers? I will have to try it when I get home tho!
    Loonym...You are missed.

    The element of one

    Breathe me in
    Breathe me in

    I disbelieve in separation. I close my eyes to see you.
    This is for you, everything I am. This is for you, take it from me.
    I, I disbelieve separation. I close my eyes
    there's no escaping me
    This is for you, everything I am. This is for you, take it from me.
    In your heart in your soul. I perceive rejuvenation

    Breathe me in. I am forever. Deep within I am eternal.

    I will return to you. I am with you always. I will never turn away from you.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    836
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
    I installed this and I'm still getting 30-40FPS on BC2 on my 275 GTX on my i7 rig, WTF? I'm seeing no improvement at all.
    What settings?

    Ryzen 3800X @ 4.4Ghz
    MSI X570 Unify
    32GB G.Skill 3600Mhz CL14
    Sapphire Nitro Vega 64
    OCZ Gold 850W ZX Series
    Thermaltake LV10

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    These drivers are fantastic for me
    3d marks did not change much, but S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat has no stutter and a frame rate boost too
    GTA IV also received a slight performance increase too.
    Left 4 Dead which has always been smooth is still smooth, but now I can crank up the FSAA some more and still enjoy the same level of smoothness.
    IMHO these are the first Forceware 195+ drivers which are actually consistently good across the board.
    John

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    At work
    Posts
    1,369
    I wonder what slight of hand was used to attain this...something has been compromised somewhere...probably image quality (again). It seems odd that NVidia would just miraculously look at the drivers and say "Wow, here's an extra 30% performance that we missed earlier."

    It seems more like NVidia is resorting to the tech equivalent of dropping weight on a vehicle by lessening the graphical load that the card has deal with. The question is, what did they drop to attain this?
    Server: HP Proliant ML370 G6, 2x Xeon X5690, 144GB ECC Registered, 8x OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB on LSi 9265-8i (RAID 0), 12x Seagate Constellation ES.2 3TB SAS on LSi 9280-24i4e (RAID 6) and dual 1200W redundant power supplies.
    Gamer: Intel Core i7 6950X@4.2GHz, Rampage Edition 10, 128GB (8x16GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2800MHz, 2x NVidia Titan X (Pascal), Corsair H110i, Vengeance C70 w/Corsair AX1500i, Intel P3700 2TB (boot), Samsung SM961 1TB (Games), 2x Samsung PM1725 6.4TB (11.64TB usable) Windows Software RAID 0 (local storage).
    Beater: Xeon E5-1680 V3, NCase M1, ASRock X99-iTX/ac, 2x32GB Crucial 2400MHz RDIMMs, eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), Samsung 950 Pro 512GB, Corsair SF600, Asetek 92mm AIO water cooler.
    Server/workstation: 2x Xeon E5-2687W V2, Asus Z9PE-D8, 256GB 1866MHz Samsung LRDIMMs (8x32GB), eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), 2x Intel S3610 1.6TB SSD, Corsair AX1500i, Chenbro SR10769, Intel P3700 2TB.

    Thanks for the help (or lack thereof) in resolving my P3700 issue, FUGGER...

  21. #46
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    763
    no score improvement in vantage. GTX260 win 7 64. No instability though as a couple people have mentioned.
    Lian Dream: i7 2600k @ 4.7Ghz, Asus Maximus IV Gene-z, MSI N680GTX Twin Frozr III, 8GB 2x4GB Mushkin Ridgeback, Crucial M4 128GB x2, Plextor PX-755SA, Seasonic 750 X, Lian-li
    HTPC: E5300@3.8, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, Gigabyte 5750 Silentcell, Mushkin 2GBx2, 2x 500gb Maxtor Raid 1, 300gb Seagate, 74gb Raptor, Seasonic G series 550 Gold, Silverstone LC16m

    Laptop: XPS15z Crucial M4
    Nikon D700 ~ Nikkor 17-35 F2.8 ~ Nikkor 50mm F1.8
    Lian Dream Work Log
    my smugmug
    Heatware

  22. #47
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Guys, it's not 30% performance improvement in ALL games, just a few titles...
    Up to a 30% increase in a couple of games.
    Last edited by BababooeyHTJ; 03-03-2010 at 01:47 PM.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    If NVIDIA states 30% performance increase in a certain game it means 15% increase in that game if you're lucky, otherwise expect 5~10% or so and in some other games if you're lucky up to 3~5% increase at most, but hey free performance upgrades doesn't cost anything...
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  24. #49
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    One full check disk; manual driver removal from device manager and manual install of the lastest driver later all is well. Good god I was || close to buying an HD5870.
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC USA
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Your issue with Mass Effect 2 is that the game engine caps framerate at 62fps.

    And seriously... if "beta" drivers on the nVidia side are that crashtastic I don't think I'm switching back. I have a near-zero tolerance for crashes, waste of time and happiness :/
    Actually its my fault. When I saw sli profile I automatically assumed, which I think almost anyone who has a multi gpu system would assume, that with the introduction of a sli profile for the game, the game's frame rate would increase. Of course this didnt seem to be the case. Now the drivers which included the sli profile for Mass Effect 2 also indicated something to give the game AA support which it natively doesnt have. My guess is that with the introduction of AA to the game, u may find it harder to achieve that capped 62 fps limit. In order to compensate they added sli support for the game. Its a theory but I am finding it hard to believe Mass Effect 2 with AA would stress a single GPU to the point that u couldnt get 62 fps. Especially a 200 series card. Again its just a theory. I honestly dont see a reason to give a game a sli profile if the profile does not increase the games FPS. That would be like giving Street Fighter IV a sli / crossfire profile but keeping the frame cap its current 62. Eh watever. Of course there are ways to get rid of that capped limit. Muahahahahaha.

    In regards to your comment about the "beta" drivers. That's just it...they aren't betas. They are officials lol. Check Nv's site. I hear u though @ crashes. Doubt anyone likes those if the crashes aren't their fault. Even when they are thier fault they dont like them lol

    I'll try the new drivers maybe this weekend. Do a driver sweep of old drivers etc. Want to finish the SP of BC2 first.
    Last edited by Trembledust; 03-03-2010 at 04:28 PM. Reason: Left out something
    Xeon w3520 oc'd to 4.2ghz w/ htt enabled
    Foxconn Bloodrage (G32 Bios)
    2 x Nvidia 285 gtx's (overclock varies. Most recent core: 700/ shaders: 1550/ ram: 1230)
    6gbs G-skill Trident ddr3 2000mhz ram @ 1604mhz (timings: 6 7 6 20 T1)
    Silverstone ST1000 1000W PSU
    WD RaptorX 150gb, WD 1tb, Seagate Perpendicular 320gb (non raid config)
    2 x LG Sata 22x DVD Burner
    Swiftech Apogee XT Extreme Water-block, Feser X-Changer 360mm Xtreme Performance Radiator, Alphacool Cape Coolplex Pro 10 External Reservior, Swiftech MCP655™ 12 VDC Pump, 3x Scythe 120mm fans, 1/2in tubing
    Creative X-Fi Titanium Sound Card
    Lian Li X-500 Case
    And a partridge in a peared tree

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •