His (ES) chip,has an unlocked multiplier,won't be the case for the "regular"
cpus.
I think it's safe to say that we've established the bold part already![]()
However the actual performance (of any hardware) would not change
with different "target markets".
A 2.2ghz cpu will perform exactly the same for "Joe Blow
Over clocker" and the "Big Shot Enterprise".
Also the money from the 2 is identical - if AMD sells 2 cpus to Joe at 1000$
(each) they get 2000$.When AMD sells 2 cpus at 1000$ to the Enteprise
they still get 2000$,but there are more Joes then enteprises.
A pic below shows the number of people participating in WCG,our (XS) team
(1 out of many) has over 1000 active members.Globally there are hundreds
of thousands of PCs and the number is growing on the daily basis.
Almost everyone out of that 1000+ overclocks their machines,stability
is not an issue,it's a given - because no one wants to lose a Work Unit.
We have a new "market segment" that basically developed over the last ~5 years.This segment is way above the "Ultra Enthusiast" "needs"
(4-6 cpu cores according to some charts),but obviously below the
"ënteprise".
It's money (a lot of it,we're talking tens of thousands of people) laying
on the road,all AMD has to do is to pick it up.
The cpus don't have to be targeted they just have to perform.
Also the term "Overclock/er" has become to general,there are at least 2 groups in it:
The first one is the "record breakers" -these guys use the LN2,Dry Ice and run benchmarks faster and faster under very,very high gigahertz (for a few minutes)
That's were all the "fame" is.
Stability here is only needed to complete the benchmark run and take a
screen shot.I do not think this group is even interested in M.cores.
The second group runs their overcloked PCs 24/7/365 at full load (without crashing btw),but of course the clocks are much lower then the "records".
This (I think) is one of the best descriptions as to "why" we need the over clocking ability.Let the motherboard manufacturers do what they do best -
give us motherboards with the features we need.
AMD has done their job already - the cpus are made.
The philosophy has always been (something like):
"give users the ability to make a choice", and that is all we really need.No need to target us







Reply With Quote
Bookmarks